Forum:Duel Records Edits

I don't think it's necessary to include duels that are briefly talked about to hype up a new character or are implied. --Finaldraw (talk • contribs) 22:45, December 22, 2017 (UTC)

I do think it is. --XBrain130™「Ｘ（エックス）ブレーン１３０」 23:01, December 22, 2017 (UTC)

Their not. It's redundant to list off duels that are only mentioned in a blink and you'll miss it sort of way, even more so with duels that are image spots. --Finaldraw (talk • contribs) 04:41, December 23, 2017 (UTC)

As do I. They have to be documented somewhere, and if we start taking opinions into account, then this all becomes extremely gray and a pain in the bum very quickly. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 08:00, December 23, 2017 (UTC)

Not every duel offhandedly brought up has to be listed off. --Finaldraw (talk • contribs) 17:46, December 28, 2017 (UTC)

It's still a piece of information that has to be recorded. You are just overthinking that this is some sort of an issue. ☺ Energy X ☻ 10:41, December 23, 2017 (UTC)

I'm not the one who turned this into some sort of issue. You lot are the ones making a big fuss about it. --Finaldraw (talk • contribs) 17:46, December 28, 2017 (UTC)

Just to know you are wrong about listing one duels as two separate. Sure it was not two on one, which is exactly we use / instead of and. (Ninja72 (talk • contribs) 19:11, December 25, 2017 (UTC))

That would imply they dueled together, which they did not. That's why they were split. --Finaldraw (talk • contribs) 17:46, December 28, 2017 (UTC)

Think of it this way. If Leon's default victory over Zigfried (due to Zigfried falsifying his name and a change in plans by Kaiba) wasn't recorded, you'd have no way of knowing how he won. Thus, tournament records are always important, even for results where the victory was by default. --MasterMarik (talk •

But the thing is, Leon and Zigfried never did duel. Kaiba dueled in his place. You can't count a duel if the duelists haven't even started. --Finaldraw (talk • contribs) 17:03, January 3, 2018 (UTC)

contribs) 21:44, December 28, 2017 (UTC) No it does not imply that they dueled together. If they dueled together, it would be with and instead of/. (Ninja72 (talk • contribs) 13:51, December 30, 2017 (UTC)) On this wiki / implies replacement. (Ninja72 (talk • contribs) 14:15, December 30, 2017 (UTC))

That doesn't tell me anything nor provide much of an argument. --Finaldraw (talk • contribs) 17:03, January 3, 2018 (UTC)

Finaldraw, this is quickly getting tiring. Don't be a gigant hypocrite, YOU are making a big fuss out of this, by deciding without care to disrupt something everyone was chill with and causing widespread edit wars.

As we can see, everyone who commented here is against you, so you clearly are the losing party.

And about taking over, when the new player keeps the same field+graveyard and/or LP as the retired player, then by cold hard logic, it's the same fricking duel! --XBrain130™「Ｘ（エックス）ブレーン１３０」 17:51, January 3, 2018 (UTC)

As far as I can tell, only Sanokal and MasterMarik have actually tried to discuss this. However, instead of discussing this like them, the rest of you are instead flat out telling me I'm wrong and given superfluous reasons as to why, like "It's been that way a long time so there's no need to change it". What's more is that you specifically XBrain are getting worked up more than you should be over something as minor as a fictional character's duel record and honestly, that's a little sad. Your rants aren't helping to move this discussion along, so how about we try to discuss this topic for a change instead, okay? --Finaldraw (talk • contribs) 23:01, January 3, 2018 (UTC)

Look, I am very sorry. I am not in a really good mood lately. I am currently stuck in a pretty boring place with limited internet (which is one of the reasons I have not replied on this sooner, or edited anything at all lately) on really sucky laptop, and you are not helping by coming out of nowhere and kicking up this confusion right before the forking project (the other cause for my low activity).

But I'm still the opinion that you are also acting a bit all-mighty there, if you excuse me. I can see that more than one user finds your declaration of what deserves to be omitted a "superfluous reason" to change stuff up. Can you really think yourself as so above this when you are stubbornly reverting reverts left-and-right? You may have noticed DragonEmeperor, someone is stubbornly reverting your reverts, has been warned and temporanely blocked more than once, so in your shoes I'd really stop doing that for fear they might come after me.

Also, if I must be sincere, pretending a well-constructed and thought-out reason to not be complete and detailed in our data reports about fictional characters is what sounds "getting worked up on something minor" to me. The very fact it is fiction, and not real people what we are talking here, is exactly the reason there's no detail too insignicant to point out.

Please, let us be, you're just making things difficult for those of use who are packing bags for moving to Yugipedia. --XBrain130™「Ｘ（エックス）ブレーン１３０」 23:34, January 3, 2018 (UTC)

XBrain 130, may I ask what is gonna happen to this wiki after this thing happens? I just read that page, which you linked and it says that FANDOM does not allow wikis to be closed, and that this wiki will still exist. But can users still contribute to it? (Ninja72 (talk • contribs) 17:01, January 4, 2018 (UTC))