User talk:TheScarecrow14

Dub changes

Cards that the dub changes too should be listed in the decklists, with a note saying it was a dub change. If they are removed, I can give you a 100% guarantee that an IP will add the cards back in without a note later on. That's why we keep them with notes. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:20, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

But surely there should be something to prevent this from happening because we all know that the dub adds them due to whatever reason the have for replacing rock cards within a deck with random cards such as Water Omotics and Exodia?

TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 11:40, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

Check the edit history of that article. Before I added the notes for the dub cards, they were simply sitting there as if they were really in his Deck. The only other option I can think of is listing dub changes in a line of prose near the Decklist. If you have any other ideas or want to discuss it, go ahead and make a forum post. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:34, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

Images

So I did say it before... removing the comment about the image policy the 2nd time means you understand what names you must use; you will not use a random name again or be barred from uploading, correct? -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 00:46, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

I know you said it before, I just didn't reply due to you being so rude about it. I did the wikia a favour by uploading the image, so simply saying can you rename it doesn't hurt.. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 01:32, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

Neither time should be considered rood (feel free to ask others about it).

By not following the image policy, you're also hindering the time that mods can use to do their own contributions. And if everyone didn't bother with the image names, we would have a lot of clashes and random unused files everywhere. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 01:47, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

I understand that if that happened, then mods would spend a lot of time editing images, but you could have simply asked me to rename it, or replace the old one instead of threatening with an image ban. It isn't as if I uploaded the image with an incorrect name out of malice... TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 01:54, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

I asked you to follow the image policy twice; and what to do if the image under the correct name already exists once. The only time I mentioned a ban was after you ignored and removed the instructions twice, and that was a last resort to just get you to comment on why you removed it, and if you have acknowledged the image poicy. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 02:03, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

Removed it before? I deleted the one you said about an hour ago, but I never saw that you posted one before that... and as I said, I read it before, but I deleted it because it was crass... TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 02:06, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

First time and Second time. Do I need to ask Dinoguy to see if they were considered rood? -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 02:12, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Question

Because they're unofficial Chinese scanlations. Rod (talk • contribs) 17:42, November 7, 2011 (UTC)

• Can you please explain? TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 17:43, November 7, 2011 (UTC)

devack deck

Hey, scarecrow! If you are online right now, could you please put add devack's decks from tag force 6 today? I really want to play the tcg playable ones. Good luck and please respond back! Guardmaster (talk • contribs) 16:36, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

Can't

I added what I know from watching videos/playing on my friends PSP yesterday and dueling him, sorry. Also my friend only has his first deck. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 19:03, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

Heart piece

Are you sure he beat two duelists? Each participants begins with one piece, which would mean Bronk defeated only one duelist. --15:29, November 28, 2011 (UTC)

Oh yeah

• You're right. Il edit it. Totally forgot D:<. Thanks. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 15:31, November 28, 2011 (UTC)

Shark

There actually is a page for Sharks. I'm not sure how much legitimacy there is to it, though. The same person who was (incorrectly) tagging those articles was the one who created it. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 21:38, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

Just because there is a page for them, it doesn't mean that they're an archetype. Apart from having several WATER monsters with Shark in their name, there isn't anything else to them. In addition, the archetype box linked to Ryoga Kamishiro's page. Eitherway, I will remove them for now because in my opinion, they're not an archetype and several other "archetypes" have been removed for the same reason. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 21:41, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

I'm also unsure as to whether or not it should be a page. It could be like Monarchs and Warrior. Let's ask an administrator who speaks Japanese. :)--Golden Key (talk • contribs) 21:56, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

Monarchs are similar and have a deck type thus a page for them is understandable. Personally I think the Warrior page should be deleted because there isn't support for monsters which have "Warrior" in their name. Eitherway, Shark's aren't big enough to be a contender to the Warrior page, and Monarchs work in a similar way. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 22:10, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

I agree it shouldn't have a page yet. And "Monarchs" have no support either, Scarecrow. So if "Warriors" shouldn't be here, neither should Monarchs. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:20, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

I understand that, but I said in an earlier post that I understand that they have a page because they work in a similar manner. Most of the Warrior monsters belong to either their own archetype e.g. Magnet Warriors. I think calling them an archetype isn't correct, maybe calling them a 'series' or something along the lines of that because aren't archetypes defined by having specific support etc? TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 22:23, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

They are a series. We're still in the process of converting such articles to use that term. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:08, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

decklists

Hey Scarecrow, Here's a good japanese site for finding Tag Force 6 Decklists

Here's the address: [1]

By the way I'm going to help you put them in too. However, the site may still be in progress. Good luck! Guardmaster (talk • contribs) 19:56, December 7, 2011 (UTC)

Shark

There is an anonymous who claims that there was no Monster Reborn in Shark's hand in episode 34. Could you please provide a screenshot which shows otherwise? --109.92.8.162 (talk) 12:12, December 10, 2011 (UTC)