Forum:Maldolce Stun

Salutations! Do join me for a spot of tea.

Chocolate Reign

Main Deck Monster Cards (14) Effect Monsters 3 Madolche Majoleine 2 Madolche Chouxvalier 2 Madolche Butlerusk Madolche Mouple Sangan T.G. Striker X-Saber Pashuul 2 X-Saber Airbellum Tragoedia Spell Cards (15) 3 Madolche Château Terraforming Reinforcement of the Army 3 Pot of Duality Smashing Ground 2 Mystical Space Typhoon Heavy Storm Dark Hole Book of Moon Monster Reborn Trap Cards (11) 2 Dimensional Prison 2 Torrential Tribute 3 Fiendish Chain 2 Solemn Warning Solemn Judgment Starlight Road Extra Deck (15) Synchro Monsters Naturia Beast Catastor Magical Android Naturia Barkion Brionac Naturia Landoise Black Rose Dragon Stardust Dragon Scrap Dragon Xyz Monsters Utopia Steelswarm Roach Number 50: Black Corn Maestroke the Symphony Djinn Daigusto Emeral Wind-Up Zenmaines

On Dueling Network, you are the demons. This is definitely unfinished. Chouxvalier is filler, Mouple's for "Naturia Beast", and the Tuners are inefficient. I might mix in T.G. if needed. Help!

Designless Square (talk • contribs) 00:51, April 13, 2012 (UTC)

I've had limited success running a single starlight road, but most people I've talked to about say that if you really wanna protect your back row from heavy, 1 is too inconsistent. As for the whole Madolce idea, it seems like it might be a bit too dependent on the power boost from the field spell... you could argue that T.G. is similarly powered by Horn of the Phantom Beast and it works alright, but Horn can be activated during damage step where it can't be MST'd, and one use gives you a draw and a monster destruction that basically pays for itself. Plus T.G. Rush Rhino is strong when it attacks even without a boost, whereas most of those monsters are a bit weak. I guess that's sorta the whole point of stun; keeping advantage and using S/T to destroy opposing monsters but I only see 8 destruction cards. Sure, it's a lot, but Idk if it's enough. I see a lot of T.G. Stun decks with no heavy and only 1 MST (that would make me a bit uncomfortable but eh) and a really extensive back row, but i don't know if that's what you're going for. It's a really interesting idea, but I can't tell how well the core archetype fill function at this point. Brakedamold (talk • contribs) 13:37, April 13, 2012 (UTC)

I might bump up a Road. Not sure what exactly to replace, though. The Field Spell isn't mainly for the power boost; it's for the recursion. It is indeed vunlerable to MST and I might ram into a monster and die. Mostly, this Deck just sustains advantage. It's not all about destruction; I can stun something with "Fiendish Chain" and later run it over with a (free) Rank 4 Xyz Monster or Barkion.

Perhaps I will drop some Spell/Trap destruction, but for what I'm not sure. It seems like getting Barkion out makes the game very difficult for the opponent, but I'm not sure.

I'm dropping 1 Chouxvalier for "Tragoedia". Time will tell how well it works.

Designless Square (talk • contribs) 23:15, April 18, 2012 (UTC)

Malefic Stardust Dragon? 33royward (talk • contribs) 03:24, April 19, 2012 (UTC)

He would be nice, but somewhat unnecessary. It's easy to search for the Field Spell, and his high ATK is handy. Designless Square (talk • contribs) 23:24, April 20, 2012 (UTC)

No offense, but I don't see the point in your deck because the Madolce Archetype has no real usability outside of Puddingcess spam. I mean sure they have a searcher and they go back to deck... but that doesn't really mean anything seeing how many other decks can do the same... I suppose you're just trying to maintain card advantage through the field spell but I don't think you're going to be able to do much outside of beatstick, and if the field spell dies, the monsters become almost useless. Just my two cents. u5h3ra1i' ^{XX-Blackwinged Karakuri Player} 02:15, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

The idea is to Normal Summon either Majoleine or Butlerusk depending on what's out, get a +1, and then Xyz or Synchro if needed, or spam if not. The Extra Monsters form a decent toolbox, and being able to make "Naturia" Synchros at +0 is quite good--one of the draws of the "Karakuri". For the most part, the Field Spell is just window dressing.

And I don't yet understand what is good about Puddingcess. At Level 4, it would be annoying but not much more dangerous than a Gladiator Beast. At Level 5, it requires Mille-feuille as an invoker, unless you want to go with "Giant Rat" at the cost of 800 ATK, and it greatly restricts your Deck's options.

So far, this plays almost like "Gadget" but with slightly more flexibility. Would you recommend the Fairy King Xyz? Designless Square (talk • contribs) 03:35, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

Yea, synching is good and all but it'll still take you two turns to get the monsters out to synch. You have like no special summoning. Trag, striker, and Reborn is the only thing allowing you to synch. You might maintain card advantage by plussing but you only have the 5 searchers that do that, TWO of them being situational (Butlerusk). Recycling Majoleine with the Château works too but it just seems like so much work for something that can be easily circumvented with just using a different archetype. As for Puddingcess, she's basically the reason for the archetype, especially since its a "gag" archetype like Amazonesses, Watts, Batterymen, or Wetlands Frogs. If you want to see a fun build of Madloche, you can look at my random build here: http://imgur.com/3JRjT . It actually works pretty well and is pretty annoying, especially if you can get off a Safe Zone with Pudding. Try it out just for fun. :D u5h3ra1i' ^{✩XX-Blackwingd Karakuri Player☯} 18:05, April 26, 2012 (UTC)