Talk:Horus the Black Flame Dragon

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Horus the Black Flame Dragon.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

Similar to Armed Dragon Page?

Maybe we should make this into a page similar to the Armed Dragon page? Horus does have it's own decktype, Horus Decree, and has a Dark Counterpart, much like Armed Dragon. This makes both distinct from other Level Monsters, especially since both Decks (DAD decks and Horus Decree) gained notoriety for being powerful. Just a suggestion Deathhacker 19:38, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

• That should have been done months ago. Zeta1127,89thLegion (talk • contribs) 04:26, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

ArchetypeNavbox

The Horus the Black Flame ArchetypeNavbox needs to be populated properly, the content from the old Horus one has everything we need, the one on all of the Horus pages, the 3 Horus the Black Flame Dragon LVs, Dark Horus, and Horus' Servant. If I knew how to do that, I would do it my self. Zeta1127,89thLegion (talk • contribs) 04:26, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Moving this page to Horus would be a better idea, imo. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 04:29, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Horus is a valid ambiguous page though, Maybe make Horus a redirect to here since this page has all of the info and has the full title, but the point is, an unpopulated ArchetypeNavbox is very annoying. Zeta1127,89thLegion (talk • contribs) 04:35, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

We'll just replace it. I'll move it and you can see why it's better. It's always possible to revert if necessary. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 04:38, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

That works, I guess, nice job. Zeta1127,89thLegion (talk • contribs) 04:42, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

The idea is that, because the ArchetypeNavbox already has the data for the stuff to appear on the page Horus, it is better for it to be the page than a disambig. That way, you don't need to use a 'redirect' for the ArchetypeNavbox, or alternatively, you don't need to populate the table again for a different page.

Besides, all the links on the Disambig can be found on this page anyways. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 04:45, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that is the simpler way to do it. Zeta1127,89thLegion (talk • contribs) 04:47, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Page name

I think this should be renamed to its old title, "Horus the Black Flame Dragon". There is no "Horus" archetype. The lore of "Horus' Servant" lists the archetype name as "Horus the Black Flame Dragon", thereby excluding itself and "Dark Horus" from being valid targets for its effect. Which would make "Dark Horus" related. And it would be very odd to have "Dark Horus" be related to a "Horus" archetype. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 04:17, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Agreed. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 04:27, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

If you look on the Japanese card, "Horus' Servant" has something in parentheses next to "ホルスの黒（こく）炎（えん）竜（りゅう）", within the quotes. I've never seen that before, and don't know what the text says, nor its significance, though the English text suggests it's just saying that it's not specific to one LV Horus (though that doesn't make much sense itself, given how the Japanese lores of other archetype support cards work). Regardless, though, I'm also in favor. 「ディノ奴千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 04:55, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, the parenthetical text is the equivalent of "(of any LV)" on the English card. And for whatever it's worth, I also agree: Horus' Servant is related to the Horus the Black Flame Dragon line, but there is no Horus archetype.--Ryusui (talk • contribs) 18:09, August 31, 2012 (UTC)

Plasma

Can you really Tribute three "Sheep Tokens" to Summon it? Is that something that can be done when dealing with Nomi monsters. I honestly don't know. If you can do that though, shouldn't that be listed somewhere the he Nomi monster page? Because at a first glance, I would say that you couldn't do that, but considering how convoluted the rules are, I also wouldn't be surprised if you could. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 09:42, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

"Sheep Tokens" cannot be Tributed for a Tribute Summon. "Sheep Tokens" can be Tributed for a Special Summon. I don't see how being Nomi has anything to do with this. The page is correct. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 10:42, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

It can (or must) be Special Summoned via Tributes because its a Nomi. I don't know, it just seems like something that's likely to come up quite often, considering the amount of Nomis that need Tributes. And at least to me, it's not obvious at all that you could do it. That has nothing to do with my not playing the outside of Tag Force in years. I never knew it even when I did play. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:31, March 18, 2012 (UTC)