Talk:REDMD OTK

This is the talk page for discussing the page, REDMD OTK.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

I apologize for my casual format the first time I posted, this is my first addition to the site. I cleaned it up and hope it is much more appropriate. But please explain how it's not an ftk. Kazeo (talk • contribs) 05:58, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

It seems fine. It's a great and simple OTK/FTK that works with only two cards-"Future Fusion" is limited and there is only one card to bring back a high-level Dragon-type monster from your graveyard instantly ("Monster Reborn"): It's not much of an FTK since it's unlikely to get both in your starting hand (.025% chance of getting any card, so multiplied by six is .15% and the chance for getting both is smaller yet). However, it still is a powerful OTK that isn't too hard to set up-you don't need to use "Future Fusion" because you can rely on cards like "Foolish Burial" and "Dragon Ravine", but it will be slower without it.BobaFett2 (talk)

I see no reason why this should be deleted. According to the OTK page on this wiki, the only 3 rules are: you have to deplete their LP in one turn, use a maximum of 4 cards, and use no forbidden cards. This OTK follows all of those rules. SuperKirbyFan (talk • contribs) 16:05, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

It also can be started without monster reborn, simply having a REDMD in your hand, with another monster to special summon it, can get the chain started as well. And that still fulfills the 4 card requirement, REDMD, 2 dragon type monsters (one needs to be summonable) and Future Fusion. I didn't realize Premature burial was banned at the time I posted it. I do apologize for that.

Kazeo (talk • contribs) 01:53, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Deletion

OTKs that require more this many cards aren't worth mentioning. This is extremely gimmicky and should be deleted. Golden Key (talk • contribs) 19:05, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

I agree. This seems to be an original idea that the creator of the page came up with. It's not something particularly notable. -- Deltaneos (talk) 12:04, January 29, 2012 (UTC)

I'm confused as to why this is bad, other than the fact that Future Fusion and Monster Reborn are Limited, and we have Future Fusion Exodia...it only requires three cards to pull off and one of the cards isn't even a specific card. BF2 Talk Deck Guides 13:00, January 29, 2012 (UTC)

It's because most combine used less than current number of hands; if you had only 6 cards in your hand, then that's it. The creator of that page has put in more cards than he original thought; so it's out of hand. How often have you draw "Future Fusion" and "Monster Reborn" in same hand at the open of duel? --FredCat 13:12, January 29, 2012 (UTC)

I don't think I understand the first part of what you're saying - you only need three cards in hand. Nonetheless, we have worse decks posted than this one. BF2 Talk Deck Guides 17:28, January 29, 2012 (UTC)

I thought the 4 card prerequisite for a One Turn Kill didn't include cards in the Deck/Extra Deck.

There should be a few more OTKs that weren't deleted because of that.

-Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 23:10, January 29, 2012 (UTC)

Why would it include cards in the Deck/Extra Deck? I'm pretty sure it's only hand and field - it's to prevent people from posting ridiculous OTKs that require you to have a perfect hand. BF2 Talk Deck Guides 23:12, January 29, 2012 (UTC)