Yugipedia:Requests for adminship/Number:100 utopia advanced/1

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Number:100 utopia advanced

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of an unsuccessful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.
Nomination

Nominator. Please say why you are nominating the candidate.


Please wait for the candidate to indicate if they have accepted the nomination or not.

Result - unsuccessful 
Adminship not granted. More experience needed. -- Deltaneos (talk) 17:03, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve as an administrator. Please answer the following four questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: help eliminate fake/under-aged/trolling user, take part in high editing of major pages or to eliminate fake/useless pages.
2. What do you consider to be your best contributions, and why?
A: my best contributes are eliminating major and minor edits that have proven to be not helpful and even destructive to the Wiki community.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: in the past the only Editing conflict I ever had was when a user had added the English names to all the zexal Characters i had assumed the names were just a form of spam so i changed them back, but i now have knowledge of this change.In this situation the matter in how i dealt with it was very civilized, i changed it back and simply stated why i thought it was incorrect, in the future i will ask the user to present my proof of the change.
4. Do you regularly contribute to any other wikis? Are you an administrator or bureaucrat on any of them, or do you have accounts with similar roles on forums, blogs, etc.? Could you provide links, if so?
A:I do contribute to other wikis but not regularly, number:100 utopia advanced is the only account i own, and i am not an administrator on any wiki.

Other editors may post optional questions for the candidate here.

Support

Oppose

  • 151 edits? Those better be some damn outstanding edits. Huajun Chen (talkcontribs) 23:15, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
  • Like our friend above said, only 151 edits and he can barely hold on with his grammar. I declared this user to NOT taking responsible till he improve his shit. As well as his own experience around the site, not just erasing wrong users for no reasons. --FredCat 23:25, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
  • Too few contributions. You should also avoid insulting users like here and here. -- Deltaneos (talk) 13:23, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • I pretty much agree with the others. You shouldn't insult other users (if they said something insulting, don't fire back). Also the only reason for erasing another persons comment, is if they're insulting/harassing another user, or editing another persons profile (or they put a subject on a talk page that in no way is trying to improve the article, and is a typical question that should be put in the Forums). If you revert a user, try to give a reason in the summery at least sometimes. Shardsilver (talkcontribs) 14:52, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Other comments