User talk:NumberC17

Character articles

Hello, NumberC17. First of all, thank you for your contributions. I've noticed that your recent edits to articles of VRAINS characters were direct copies of the Wikia articles. However, we've forked away from them, so neither us nor them should use the other's content without permission. It would be appreciated if you avoid using their content in the future. GMTails (talk • contribs) 02:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Card Trivia: Uria the Lord of Searing Flames

Please explain why you removed the Kenichi Hara trivia with no explanation. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 02:51, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Because the Sacred Beasts were all designed by Kenichi Hara. Says so on their page. NumberC17 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. In the future, it can be helpful for other editors if you give a brief description of your edit in your edit summary, for cases like this. This is only a suggestion though, for cases where you're aware you may be making a controversial/questionable edit; this is not a rule. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 03:27, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Needle Sunfish

Please do more than the bare minimum, when it comes to verifying trivia. With regards to this edit, you linked to a completely incorrect family of fish. If you had checked a little further, you would have seen the correct family. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 05:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

I see you edited the page after I left a message here, but that change was not what I was referring to. At the original linked Wikipedia page (before you edited the Trivia page in the first place), there were arguably 4 main options, all under the Fish section: Centrarchidae, Molidae, Basking shark, and Opah. I don't know why you didn't investigate all of them (or at least more than 1), especially since the image at "Centrarchidae" did not look very similar to "Needle Sunfish". I've now fixed the link to point to the correct group of fish. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 16:40, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Card Trivia: Tricolor Gadget

First, I was not aware of the template for referring to episodes / manga chapters until you pointed it out to me, so that is on me. Second, in Duelist chapter 339 (Millennium 61), Green, Red, and Yellow Gadget are shown in the same positioning as I said. Not sure what part of what I said was "not factual". (Image for reference [1]) --Bhigpx (talk • contribs) 22:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

• Oh, sorry, I thought you meant the actual pose of the Gadget monsters, it the positioning. That isn’t mistake. NumberC17 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Retrained counterparts

This term should only be used if the counterpart is actually the same entity as the previous one. For example, I doubt Transcend Dragion and Trident Dragion are the exact same dragon. In this case, just call them an [archetype] counterpart or whatever fits based on context. MadRest (talk • contribs) 18:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Cards based on scenes from the series

Hi, NumberC17! A while ago, I remember you were working on a list of cards based on scenes from the series, which was restricted to our Forum space. I believe this list is worthy of its own article, so I begin moving it to a dedicated article, which is still incomplete. If you are still interested on continuing this project, feel free to edit the new article. JustGian (talk • contribs) 23:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

• Oh this is a surprise! Thank you so much, and thank you for informing me! NumberC17 (talk • contribs) 00:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Enough with the formatting fetish.

You seem to have a pathological formatting fetish. It doesn't make things better, clearer, easier to understand. Meanwhile you keep adding these phraseological, grammatical and spelling errors because you fundamentally don't understand what you're doing. Phrases aren't "terms". "Confectionary" isn't a word. "symbols used to write Japanese phonological units" is a meaningless jumble of word-like things. I've seen people who waste their life on these bizarre, borderline OCD formatting edit rampages, not on just this wiki, but many others. The content you have contributed is low-quality nonsense that can easily be debunked with a minimal amount of research. I can't believe I have to say this, but contribute worthwhile, well-researched content, and stop wasting your life on your arbitrary formatting standards.2001:EE0:50E5:CE10:F98C:AAC2:920E:DBCC (talk) 17:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

• Wow, dude. Do you need some Preparation H for that butthurt? I don’t appreciate the way you snap at me over nothing and call me incompetent and overconfident. And you’re right, I do have some OCD because people like you leave a muddled mess of the trivia page. I mean seriously, "The inverse of that is to ride a 逆玉の輿". Seriously? Did you mean "derived from"? And you broke down "いとをかしかな Itookashi ka na" into three unnecessary segments. And your wokashi trivia segment in translation leads to the word "scarecrow". I maybe OCD, but you're unnecessarily aggressive.NumberC17 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

• Seconding this in regards to the aggression. Intimidation or harassment of other users will not be tolerated. This is your only warning. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 00:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

• "butthurt"? is this the level of discourse going on here? Are you a literal high-schooler? Take this as a warning, rather than "hostility." I've seen people like you on other wikis, those who are overly obsessessed with inconsequential details. Some behave like bots, and those wikis support bot automation, meaning they could be learning how to make bots instead of wasting their precious lives like that. It's what you're doing here. It's tragic, frankly. You're not contributing anything of note, and instead you add errors and misinformation. The original trivia content you "contributed" on that very page feels insulting to anybody who knows how to Google. Do not incumber yourself with nonsense. I think you can benefit greatly with some minimal engagement with the Japanese wiki yugioh-wiki.net. I took some of the trivia that I was not as confident as you were to fabricate from there, and if I could I would like give them as acknowledgement as possible.
• "This is your only warning" Keep your warning to yourself buddy. I tried to rectify the bad information this user is pushing out there but I couldn't give less of a damn about this wiki. I didn't even bother to register, as you see. It just frustrates me that incompetent people who suffer from the Dunning-Kruger effect are also too much of eager beavers. They could be improving on their lives, hell, even on this wiki hobby of theirs, but instead, they focus on acting like literal robots.2001:EE0:50E5:CE10:D999:ED04:956C:2B4A (talk) 11:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC)