Talk:Zombie counterpart

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Zombie counterpart.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

I think the disputed cards should be into the category. My only question is: why not? K.White 18:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Still, maybe Des Lacooda shouldn't. I'm not sure of that one, it isn't that related to 3-Hump Lacooda, I think.

Image

Why are "Curse of Vampire", "Plaguespreader Zombie" and "Zombie World" part of the image. Non of them have non-Zombie versions. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 02:10, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure about Curse but Plaguespreader is used to Synchro Summon a lot of them and Zombie World "Zombifies" the original.BobaFett2 (talk)

I realize that, but it doesn't change the fact that they're not part of the archetype or group. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:24, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

I know and agree but I don't know who created the image.BobaFett2 (talk)

But still I think these cards should be kept as "Related", mainly "Plaguespreader Zombie". LegenaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) January 4th, 2012, 21:40 (UTC)

Counterparts

I know (at least most of) the counterparts of all cards from this archetype are listed in their respective Trivias, but in my opinion it should be listed on this page (With a board listing the members and their counterparts). And also, as I said on the previous topic, cards like "Plaguespreader Zombie" and "Zombie World" should be added as Related or in the Support list. LegenaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) January 4th, 2012, 21:48 (UTC)

A table sounds like a good idea to me.

Related, maybe. Not support, this isn't an archetype. It has no support. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:30, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

I'll add a table then, I just don't know how to add the cards as Related, I tryed to do something like that once but I couldn't :|. Also, I think "The Snake Hair" should be remove from the Related, since it doesn't have any Zombie counterpart. LegenaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) January 5th, 2012, 22:31 (UTC)

On different subject; I kindly noticed something complete different - In this article's table, it showed Skull Archfiend of Lightning while in Reanimation Wave's Trivia article, it showed "Summoned Skull" being reanimated into Archfiend Zombie-Skull instead. So what is the way to correct ourselves in this way? --FredCat 23:10, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

Well, I had this doubt as well. But if you see, Skull Archfiend of Lightning is Summoned Skull's evolution. So, both can be considered, but I put Skull Archfiend of Lightning mainly because of their original Japanese names: "Undead Skull Demon" (Archfiend Zombie-Skull) and "Thunderclap Devil King - Skull Demon" (Skull Archfiend of Lightning). So, Skull Archfiend of Lightning is the true counterpart, but all 3 are 3 different versions of the same monster though. LegenaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) January 5th, 2012, 23:24 (UTC)

If you said so, then the trivia that I posted must be fixing; since it still said "Summoned Skull" as we are discussing. --FredCat 23:28, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

You can add a relation by adding "archrelated1 = Zombie counterpart" to the text on a card page. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:05, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

Bitelon / Vampire Dragon?

• Do we have any evidence that "Bitelon" and "Vampire Dragon" are related in any way? Besides both of them having 2400 ATK and only 1 eye, I don't see any similarity.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 03:24, August 25, 2012 (UTC)

They can fly! lol kidding. Actually you got a point. They also doesnt resemble each other that much and they have different Levels. I dont think Vampire Dragon was meant to be a counterpart of Bitelon. ----SharkTenjo 03:28, August 25, 2012 (UTC)

Red-Eyes Zombie Dragon

We all know that although Red-Eyes Zombie Dragon's appearance may imply that it is zombified version of Red-Eyes Darkness Dragon, its Level proves that its actually a zombified version of Red-Eyes Black Dragon. Lot of people are constantly changing the members table from REBD to REDD, so we have to correct it again. Is there something that can be done to inform people to check the monsters well before changing the table? Kentaru Z (talk • contribs) 02:43, September 9, 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry but that was correct, Zombie version don't have front limbs, just like Darkness Dragon. Zombie Dragon is more resembled to "Red-Eyes Darkness Dragon" more than to "Red-Eyes B. Dragon". So let's just leave that until we get more sources. --iFredCat 02:48, September 9, 2012 (UTC)

A hidden note might helps. ZingerZheng (talk • contribs) 02:51, September 9, 2012 (UTC)

Go for it, my friend. That's such a great idea. --iFredCat 02:54, September 9, 2012 (UTC)

I know Zombie Dragon resembles more Darkness Dragon, I'm not blind, but it shares Level with Black Dragon. Remember that most zombie counterparts share ATK, DEF, Level and Attribute with their normal counterparts, just like the Dark counterparts with their originals (Except they share Type instead of Attribute), and therefore, Zombie Dragon is a zombie counterpart to Black Dragon, if we search for a backstory, we can say that when Red-Eyes Black Dragon was transformed into a zombie, it also was also upgraded, and that's why it looks like Darkness Dragon.

Kentaru Z (talk • contribs) 03:20, September 9, 2012 (UTC)