Difference between revisions of "User talk:Missign0"

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 120: Line 120:
  
 
According to [[Talk:King]], they must contain "王者". <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">-[[User:Falzar FZ|Falzar FZ]]- ([[User talk:Falzar FZ#top|talk page]]|[[User:Falzar FZ/Tips and Guides|useful stuff]])</span> 14:32, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
 
According to [[Talk:King]], they must contain "王者". <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">-[[User:Falzar FZ|Falzar FZ]]- ([[User talk:Falzar FZ#top|talk page]]|[[User:Falzar FZ/Tips and Guides|useful stuff]])</span> 14:32, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
: All current support say "王者". So "王者" is the archetype. "王" does not have support, so that is not an archetype. <span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">-[[User:Falzar FZ|Falzar FZ]]- ([[User talk:Falzar FZ#top|talk page]]|[[User:Falzar FZ/Tips and Guides|useful stuff]])</span> 15:09, May 8, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:09, 8 May 2012

Welcome

Welcome to my Talk Page. Leave your comments, suggestions, corrections and whatever you want here. Thank you.

Interesting Deck

I happned to have seen your deck. Mighty Interesting and looks good, wonder what your strategy is XD

Well I would like to duel ya sometimes. But I don't have any instant messaging systems. Ah well :P, Btw I would recommend you add Vampire Lady to your deck if you can get your hands on it. Zeonark 05:18, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Cool deck... DRAGONS ARE COOL! F.G.D owner 04:01, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Card Tips:Advanced Ritual Art

  • I'd like to know why you ADDED a spelling mistake to this page. >_< Danny Lilithborne 04:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
  • how do you display your deck a list like that. from User:Vanharo

shadowrealms

ae mano peguei essa informação com o Pipo e falou que vc e brasileiro né??

e venho aqui perguntar se vc e cadastrado em shadowrealms.com.br se não da um pulo lá e se cadastra lá que esta rolando uma promoção de criação de cartas no yugiohcardmaker.net a melhor carta ganha um CRMS-SE!!--Modo assalto 13:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Excuse me but can you help me with a deck list code if you want to see what is wrong please go to my User page -ProtoMachineKing

Pandemonium Watchbear only prevents Pandemonium from being destroyed by cards effects; the fact that a Field Spell is destroyed when another one is activated is indeed a Game Mechanic and thus Watchbear has no influence over this;it must be a glitch if it happens in the game.PoirotH 03:45, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

RE:Break Draw

That sword can be just about any sword. Based on what you say,it is no better than pure speculation. And if there are other trivia like this, I would appreciate it if you could point them out for me so I can make sure if they are like your statement.PoirotH 09:07, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

Well, to be honest, that does indeed look similar to him,I myself have seen a few episodes of it. And unlike Break Draw's artwork,this one is not so obsure. Besides it's OK if cards sometimes make references to outside popular culture (like books, TV, historical events etc.)PoirotH 07:51, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

Hae there just wondering if you cut offf the zombie charge deck


joey.adidas

Re: Card Search Categories and CardTable2

  1. Look like the same thing to me. I've merged them now.
  2. I take it you're using Internet Explorer 6? I've seen the same problem when using Internet Explorer 6 before. If so the best thing for you to do would be to upgrade newer version of Internet Explorer or use a different browser like Firefox. But we should really see if we can get the problem fixed on all browsers. I might poke around later and see if I can find any fix. -- Deltaneos (talk) 05:31, October 15, 2009 (UTC)
Is the [show] button appearing for you now on the video game lores etc? I think it should be working irrespective of what browser you use now. -- Deltaneos (talk) 09:58, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Do you speak portuguese? ShredderArbok 21:00, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Olá

É sim, e o número anda aumentando nos últimos meses!

Hey! xD

What's up, man ^^. I'm goig to cyberfox now, try to conect there too [i'm reinstallig hamachi now] -> G_9999

Concerning deletion of Urgent Tuning Light Swarm OTK article

Hey can you give me a more direct reason why you flagged the article for deletion, the reason you put on the article was too vague, not trying to be a jerk or anything, just want to clear it up. Xstravagant 06:51, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply Xstravagant 07:48, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Hey, Man!

Still Alive? I'm on hamachi, sorry about the time =/...

G_9999 June 3/10, 02:04am

Still On

Go Go Go! xD

G_9999

Hello, I'm new.

Hey, I noticed you were on about the time I posted this, I was hoping you could give me a few pointers as I'm new to the Wiki community but I'd love to help out. Thanks in advance!

LunarWingCloud (talkcontribs) 06:05, August 19, 2010 (UTC)

"Destroy Card" Categories

I see that u made an editing in some Amazoness's cards in "Monster/Spell/Trap Categorie(s)" but there is a mistake about buting "Destroy Card" Categories.

in "Amazoness Heirloom" page, u put alot of Categories that go to destroy monsters like "Destroys face-up Monster Cards", "/Destroys Attack Position Monster Cards", "Destroys your opponent's Monster Cards" .. etc.

I thank its batter to put only the Categories that fit with the card, in this case "Destroys Monster Cards" is the right one.

maybe ur asking me why doing that ? actuality doing this will help to found the right effect. for exambel, if I'm going to search for any cards that destroy ONLY face-up monster in my opponent's field, all what I will see is alots of cards that actuality destroy any monster like "Dark Hole" becuse the one who edite its page put all the Categories about destroying monster cards. and I will have difficulty to found the right card. --B. Dragoon (talkcontribs) 13:32, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

Request for comment

There is currently a forum discussion going on about how to properly classify archetypes, as well as what "archrelated" actually means. Since I see many of your edits involve those two things, I'd like to ask you to voice your opinion on the matters at Forum:Archetype Classification. Thanks, Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 15:31, April 22, 2011 (UTC)

Archetype relation

Per Forum:Archetype definition (again), consensus is that a monster appearing in a card's artwork does not make it related to an archetype/series. Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 18:37, March 2, 2012 (UTC)

That's the most common way it will be used, yes. It can get a bit more complicated though. The "worst" example I can think of is "Wild Fire" being related to "Volcanic" because "Wild Fire" supports "Blaze Accelerator", which is related to "Volcanic" because "Tri-Blaze Accelerator" supports "Volcanic Doomfire".
Then there's stuff that's related via flavor text. Like "Mad Lobster" for "Dark World".
There's also relation via Fusions. "Rainbow Dragon" is related to "Elemental HERO" and "Neos" because it fuses with "Elemental HERO Neos" for "Rainbow Neos".
Also, there's anime effects being changed so that they don't support an archetype. We list them as related instead. "Heroic Chance" is related to "Heroic Champion" because its anime effect supports it, but its real-world effect does not.
The main point is that card art should be covered on the card trivia pages (and card storylines).
....After typing all that, I'm thinking we need to create a policy page that covers all this, since it's not exactly simple. Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 18:03, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
That's not a bad idea, but we'd have to restructure the templates a bit. I'm not sure its worth the trouble, especially if we do document all this somewhere in the future.
That should be shown in some way on the appearances page too. The "animelore" and "mangalore" parameters are now open by default, so any differences can be easily seen on the actual card page. That's why we removed all instances of {{CardTable2}} from the appearances pages.
But if they anime effect supported something, then the card's creators clearly intended for it be related even if the effect was changed.
I'd appreciate some help with that, thanks. :) Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 19:05, March 6, 2012 (UTC)

Meowback

You have new messages
Hello, Missign0. You have new messages at FredCat100's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

King

According to Talk:King, they must contain "王者". -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 14:32, May 8, 2012 (UTC)

All current support say "王者". So "王者" is the archetype. "王" does not have support, so that is not an archetype. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 15:09, May 8, 2012 (UTC)