Forum:0 atk
| Forums: | Index → Help desk → 0 atk Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 4940 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
Can 0 ATKs monster destroy each other by battle?--Leonhartzz (talk • contribs) 11:18, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
- This question have been repeat for many times, so yes, it can as new ruling coming in Marik Deck. --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. 11:22, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
- In TCG they will be destroyed. In OCG they won't be destroyed.
- Then, after Marik Deck comes out. In both _CGs they won't be destroyed. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 11:33, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
Then why they change it?--Leonhartzz (talk • contribs) 11:35, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
- They seem to be changing any differences in the TCG to match the OCG. Recent ones include Prisma and Aegis of Gaia.
- Also, why is this in the Help desk and not the Yu-Gi-Oh! Ruling Queries forum? -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 11:37, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
What is changing from that card? And did they will change the rulings in Convulsion of nature? Oh sorry then..i will put it in that next time..--Leonhartzz (talk • contribs) 11:49, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
- For those 2, it's actually more in the wording (with the new reprints). Prisma now sends as a cost in the TCG to match the OCG, and Aegis now inflicts damage.
- A while ago, there was a topic about that. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 12:00, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Note that they used the OCG ruling in Worlds 2010. Whether this is an official ruling reversal or if they were just using the OCG rulings there is unclear, so if you're in a tournament, then you should probably ask a judge. --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 03:51, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
