Talk:Fish OTK

not a OTK unless you can guarantee you can make a direct attack, provide a non-situational way or change it to "Fish Synchro Deck".--Moneypony 01:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

still no reason why it has OTK in it's name when it has no way to OTK, summon 2 synchros won't win you the duel especially since it can be stopped by a Threatening Roar and summon lots of powerful monster is just a basic strategy, not a OTK.--Moneypony 02:12, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

coelacanth negates the effs of the special summoned fishs, so u can't tribute oyster tokens, becuase oyster meister can't summon they. --Pipo Destruction 01:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

"Oyster Meister" still gets the tokens because that effect activates in the Grave. Danny Lilithborne 02:00, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

It's supposed to be an OTK by using Dark Strike Fighter, which when used correctly can take out more than half of the opponent's life points using effect damage, so there's no need to attack

Fish Deck

This style is crap i got a better one that would crush this deck one good card being Messenger of Peace GREAT!!! field control with this deck and all you have to do is dont pay for the effect when you get what you want (i dont want to say anymore casue i want to keep my deck a sercret on how i use it) but the messager is a starter take it from there

^ = '_'

First off, this can be a OTK, but not normally. It typically takes the form of a Colossal Fighter OTK, a page which already exists.

Second, the Fish page can be summed up as "Dumb until SDKC. Use that," and then a Decklist. Is there really so little content for the Type that one monster defines every interesting thing they can do? Dinosaur, for instance, has colorful and directive advice on support and play style. While Dinosaurs admittedly have a constant thread, there must be some constants about "Phantom Dragonray Bronto", "Fish Depth Charge", card advantage...Some kind of distinction between "normal use" and "use" that would keep these pages from being redundant.

Designless Square (talk • contribs) 22:26, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

First off - why the hell is this Talk Page still active ever through the main article is either missing in action or dead by troll spamming? And second, you cannot prove anything that this article has same identity to Colossal Fighter's Article due to paradox of article "being missing in action". --FredCat 10:08, August 11, 2011 (UTC)