Talk:Kurivolt

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Kurivolt.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

Archetype

I don't think this card should be in the Kuribohs archetype because it is a Thunder-Type monster, not a Fairy or Fiend like Kuriboh, Winged Kuriboh, and Kuribon. 69.255.214.251 (talk) 19:14, August 18, 2011 (UTC)

It is in the Kuriboh archetype. Otherwise Kuribon is not either, because it is a Fairy, not a Fiend. And Kuribolt's name also contains クリボ that is present on all Kuriboh-related monsters, including Kuribon. Regardless of the Type, if the name fits, then it is a member.Order (talk • contribs) 19:22, August 18, 2011 (UTC)

By your definition, all the Karakuri monsters would be in the Kuriboh archetype.

The Kuribohs are not an actual archetype because they do not have any support cards (I just went through them all, and every single card previously marked as "support" actually supports specific cards); this makes them a group and means that cards should not be added as members just because they have a certain string in their name; they also have to fit the "theme" of the group. I'm not entirely sure whether Kuribolt fits the theme or not, myself. 「ディノ奴千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 20:23, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

Right, it's not a true archetype. I believe "Kuribolt" should be in it though. It looks Kuriboh-ish, has "kuri" in its name is used by the protagonist. That's good enough for me. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:37, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

This nearly-naked ballfreak was third one to support the main character, though in fourth Yu-Gi-Oh! show. Why have Yusei not taken the Kuri monster? --FredCat 20:41, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

For unknown reasons. That are completely unrelated to this conversation anyway. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:46, September 2, 2011 (UTC)