User talk:RedEyesBurn69

Welcome

Hi and welcome to the Yu-Gi-Oh! wiki! Thank you for your edit to the Card Tips:Red-Eyes Flare Metal Dragon page.

If you need help, you can consult these pages:

• Help:Contents
• Manual of style
• Chat policy

If you would like to make a suggestion or ask for assistance, feel free start a topic at the forums or contact an administrator.

RE:(Tyrant Dragon)

That's fine, but your tip still neglected mentioning a method to Summon "Tyrant Dragon" from the Graveyard. In any case, most of the tips you've been adding are very situational, as they require many specific cards. Combos here should be limited to 2-3 cards (depending), with more cards allowed if the basic combo is feasible and can be further strengthened. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 19:11, December 5, 2016 (UTC)

(The Unfriendly Amazon)

Well, it's not necessarily "underwhelming", but the tip doesn't work. Imagine controlling "The Despair Uranus" and "Messenger of Peace" while you have 50 LP. When your Standby Phase comes around, "Messenger of Peace" will be destroyed, because the "pay 100 LP or destroy this card" portion of the text isn't treated as an effect. Therefore, it can't be negated by card effects. The same applies to "The Unfriendly Amazon"; that maintenance cost won't be negated. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 04:35, December 27, 2016 (UTC)

A reminder that Tips pages are to be taken with a grain of salt, as people can be incorrect in their tips (such as some of yours), so you shouldn't be surprised if one is wrong. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 05:32, December 27, 2016 (UTC)

Tips

Some of your more recent tips are too situational to be effective or worthwhile because they require too many cards. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 17:51, January 7, 2017 (UTC)

Traditional Format

When you go to edit, click the big A button at the top. It's 5th from the left. That'll give you text which you can then change to Traditional Format. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 22:26, January 11, 2017 (UTC)

Kind of, but it also ventures way too far into theory territory IMO. Saying it represents his lust for power is already pure conjecture on my part but I kind of liked your theory so I wanted to find some kind of middle ground. FighterofLight (talk • contribs) 17:10, January 18, 2017 (UTC)

If you're going to keep posting your theories on trivia pages, at least try not to give every single piece of evidence for it. FighterofLight (talk • contribs) 17:29, January 18, 2017 (UTC)

RE: Diabolos

Look at "Diabolos". It can't be Special Summoned, and it requires 2 Tributes to Tribute Summon (unless you have something like "The First Monarch" or "Double Coston"). You're better off making your Deck more consistent with discarding your own hand (or opponent's hand) than sacrificing space to make room for a meager interaction at controlling what the opponent draws. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 18:14, February 13, 2017 (UTC)

RE: Infected Mail

Please make a new header when making a message on my talk page. "Infected Mail" sends the monster to the Graveyard, while "Infernal Dragon" only triggers if it's destroyed on the field and sent to the Graveyard as a result. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 16:23, February 18, 2017 (UTC)

Diabolos does nothing to eliminate the opponent's hand. It just lets you look at the top card of their Deck, and decide if you want them to draw another card instead of that one. The opponent doesn't lose any cards as a result of Diabolos' effect, because it takes place before their draw, not instead of their draw. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 16:26, February 18, 2017 (UTC)

Just to make sure: You are aware that if you put the top card of their Deck on the bottom, the opponent still gets to draw the card that was underneath that top card, right? --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 18:13, February 18, 2017 (UTC)

Regarding berserker soul

have you even read Berserker Soul? you seem to be under the impression it just lets you attack 8 times.

Not only is that a bad tip, it doesn't even make sense. It is not a MINIMUM of 7 Attack, It's only 1 attack, plus 500 per monster you mill for a maximum of 5500 damage. Berserker soul fails if you draw a non-monster, and nothing assures you don't draw an MST or something.

IRL Berserker soul does NOT enable multi attacking, so your "tip" just outright fails

You seem to have this happen, a LOT so I'd advice you to pay attention to what it says when you are editing a tip page. Check rulings and read the card thoroughly before adding a tip

Dread (talk • contribs) 06:20, March 16, 2017 (UTC)

There's a limit

You've been continually adding situational (or just inaccurate) card tips with no signs of learning. From now on, if you insert an incorrect tip that can easily be determined by reading the card text (as opposed to a somewhat obscure ruling/mechanic), you'll be blocked for a brief period of time, with this time being extended for each repeat incident. Normally this sort of "incorrect card tip" thing isn't an issue, but you continually add card tips en masse, so it is an issue. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 14:28, March 28, 2017 (UTC)

RE: Cyber Jar + Advice

Regarding "Cyber Jar": Notice how "Maxx "C"" says each time your opponent Special Summons a monster(s), immediately draw 1 card. That means you're only going to draw 1 card (maximum) because of Cyber Jar's effect.

Regarding "Performapal Drago Remora": Normally, when monsters are Summoned by another card effect that also destroys them during the End Phase, that's because they're intended to be used as Materials (or be Tributed) for a Summon. This can be especially seen when that card effect prevents them from attacking and/or negates their effects. Because "Rescue Rabbit" was specifically designed to enable Xyz Summons, the monsters aren't going to be useful for much else.
Like I've said before, there's no point in keeping the monsters around unless you're going to Summon a monster using them. I'm not sure why'd you need more than 1 turn to do that. Plus, because "Rescue Rabbit" is ambiguous and says "Destroy them during the End Phase", it means the destruction will be attempted during each player's End Phase, meaning that your monsters are going to be very dependent on Remora surviving.

Regarding "Last Turn": All I can recommend is checking the cards listed at Pays Life Points for cost. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 21:14, March 29, 2017 (UTC)

RE:Crime-Punishment Gamble

Yes I can. "Artifact" Decks, also maybe "Shaddoll" Decks using "El Shaddoll Fusion", maybe "Traptrix" via the effect of "Traptrix Rafflesia". There's quite a few (but those are the only ones I can currently think of). --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 05:48, April 9, 2017 (UTC)

Buster Blader, the Dragon Destroyer Swordsman

You need to stop inserting tips for hyper-specific scenarios. Regarding "Red-Eyes Fang with Chain" and "Clashing Souls", that's basically like you adding to the "Dark Hole" tips page, "This card is good for Dragon Decks to take down Buster Blader with".
1) You're over-rating how good the Buster Blader Fusion really is, and
2) you shouldn't need to mention 'Dragon Decks' in those examples you inputted, unless there is a reason why the recommended card works better in Dragon Decks than other Decks (and no, there is no special reason why "Clashing Souls" would be especially good in a Dragon Deck). --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 05:20, April 19, 2017 (UTC)

RE: Mistaken Accusation

Not that I can think of at the moment. That card is iffy, because it doesn't actually stop the card that's already on the field, and the opponent should ideally be using copies of that repeatedly throughout the Duel. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 06:05, April 29, 2017 (UTC)

Trivia

We don't note "coincidental" trivia. That's the worse kind of trivia here, since there is no restriction on what is considered to be "trivia". We only note trivia that's deemed to be intentional, otherwise you have people claiming various monsters look like X (and you can't argue against it). --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 00:05, April 30, 2017 (UTC)

RE:What??

I'm saying that there's no point in using it in Traditional since there's far more consistent and overpowered stuff running around.

It also won't work in the TCG once the errata comes through. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 04:27, June 7, 2017 (UTC)

Red Eyes Deck Ideas

hi as another Red-Eyes Player, i add one of my Red-Eyes decks i currently use against AI. This version combines Red-Eyes with Blue-Eyes and Felgrand. I will commit my other Red-Eyes with BusterBlader or with Gemini Warrior later too. --hanmac (talk • contribs) 18:09, June 10, 2017 (UTC)

RE:Dueltaining HEROs

In that case, I want you to tell me how you're going to get a certain HERO monster to battle 5 times in 1 turn, with the aid of something like "Goddess Bow" or "Evil HERO Infernal Gainer". Remember, you also have the additional obstacle of ensuring the opponent controls 5 monsters or a monster that can't be destroyed by battle.
Also, how far are you going to bend yourself just to achieve a "draw 2" condition that likely will only occur once in the given Duel, since it requires multiple cards in order to achieve any of the first four conditions? Not to mention it's vulnerable to destruction.
The majority of the time, if you're attempting to meet one of Dueltainment's conditions, you're extending yourself to do actions that you normally wouldn't attempt (hence the card's name). But this doesn't matter, since the viability of the card is just an opinion; it's the validity of the tips we're discussing here. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 03:18, June 18, 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Heros

In Greek mythology, a hero is defined as a demigod born of an immortal conceiving a child with a mortal. It was basically a birthright and thus most Greek heroes have committed as many atrocities as they did great deeds. Chimera-gui (talk • contribs) 04:27, June 18, 2017 (UTC)