Forum:Need Help With My Burn Deck

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Rate My Burn Deck

As the title says, i currently am interested in burn decks, I currently have one, but would like it to be rated on a 1-10 scale, with some constructive criticism if possible.

P.S. Just saying, but most of my cards(I'm pretty sure all, actually, except for 1) are all old school. From around the time when they were still airing the Battle City Arc, for the anime.

P.S.S. The lack of monsters in my deck does not concern me. I'm going for pretty much a full burn deck, to lower the opponents LP as fast as i can, with some LP slight regen., and some cards to slow down the opponent. —This unsigned comment was made by StealthX99 (talkcontribs) 01:59, July 12, 2013‎ (UTC)

Well, I won't give it a score, but it would suffice to say that this Deck has an incredible amount of room for improvement. If you plan to go Fire Princess Burn, make sure you have ways of finding and protecting her, else your life gain means nothing. Otherwise, stick to pure burn damage as it will do the job faster. See this guide or that guide for more tips. --Gadjiltron (talkcontribs) 02:27, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

I would rate good but still need what I put in it to work better Jack Blankr 23:21, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

Honestly, on a scale of 1-5 for burn decks, this is probably close to a 2. I would read Gadjilitron's deck guides, they'll probably really help you. I honestly think Chain Burn (Search for "Chain Strike" using Ctrl+F) is the only burn deck that is worthwhile for a regionals. Also, Magic Cylinder is semi-limited in the advanced format, so you can only run 2. Also, I don't get the point of the smaller burn damage cards, sure Sparks is cool, but 200 is too small, but Just Desserts is better. --Dark Ace SP (Talk) 00:21, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
"Magic Cylinder" is Unlimited (September 2012 Lists). --Missign0 (talkcontribs) 03:23, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

I had a feeling something was terribly off with the Deck. It has now been restored to its former... questionable... condition so that we can all see what was originally up with it. --Gadjiltron (talkcontribs) 13:42, July 16, 2013 (UTC)