Difference between revisions of "User talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive8"

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (→‎ur name: subst signature templates)
 
(98 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
::''Also see Archives [[User Talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive1|1]], [[User Talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive2|2]], [[User Talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive3|3]], [[User Talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive4|4]], and [[User Talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive5|5]], and [[User Talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive6|6]].''
+
::''Also see Archives [[User Talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive1|1]], [[User Talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive2|2]], [[User Talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive3|3]], [[User Talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive4|4]], and [[User Talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive5|5]], [[User Talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive6|6]], and [[User Talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive7|7]].''
  
−
===cheers init. got the forum===
+
==Question==
 +
What cards can get a field spell from your deck/graveyard? I need help getting a field spell for my cloudian deck
  
 +
Terraforming can get back any Field Spell Card from your deck.
  
−
== [[Forum:Removal of the CategorySelect tool]] ==
+
Bunn3yTrade - YouTube
  
−
Hi Deus Ex Machina. You're probably aware of the CategorySelect tool? Could you leave comments on whether you'd like to see it removed or not [[Forum:Removal of the CategorySelect tool|here]]. Thank you. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 18:06, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
+
==errrr==
  
−
== You dont know the rules of yugioh ==
+
why is there a large negative nuber by this page on my wachlist?
  
−
Half of this wikia is based on wrong Rulings
+
==Field Spell help==
−
If a monsters effect sets the ATK/DEF that was ? to a amount the effect has faded so the new ATK/DEF is on as long the monster stays on the field. Even if a monster is flipped face down by Book of Moon the ATK/DEF can't be negated because it isn't a effect anymore like the effect of
 
−
Bower Bond,... {{Unsigned|ANDELE3025|22:34, November 12, 2009}}
 
  
−
First I Didnt insult others I insulted you.
+
There are 2 that I have in my deck. I have Minefieldriller and Ancient Fairy Dragon. [[User:Synchro Star|Synchro Star]] 21:12, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
−
Second if the Card's effect is This card's ATK is equal to (Values)
 
−
then the ATK is changed by flipping face down.
 
−
But if the cards effect is like: The original ATK and/or DEF of this card (Values) or This card's ATK and/or DEF become equal to (Values) the ATK is only changed if the card is removed from the field!!! (Did you ever read the official rules on a world championship or the pharao tour?)
 
  
−
Do you mean Konami FAQ(fan made site), Yu-Judges (they are Konami approved but not made by Konami) and Konami DE (Translaton from the real site)
 
−
Look at the http://www.yugioh-card.com/japan/ for the ruling Changes by gaming style. (Tournament, Free, Official, Bet,...)
 
−
Overdragons new ATK and DEF are <First removed after the card is summoned again, sent to the deck or RFP, because it states the '''ORIGINAL''' ATK and DEF while Montage Dragons ATK is held by its effect(Skill Drain effect ATK of Montage not the ORIGINAL ATK and DEF of Overdragon).
 
  
−
But Fortress dragon Edits the 0 to x1000 Value while the Overdragons ? are x800 Value monsters.
+
== Thank you ==
−
And Sry I made a mistake with the translating of Cyber Eltanin but there is a whole article on the net with arguing about what stats are changed by what cause (a idiot wrote that the ATk change od Axt of Despair is effective even is the Card is removed by MST or Heavy Storm) LOL SRY Fot the insult again
 
  
−
Reply from MY: First Your friend is the one who is gay.(A lot of yugioh players have girlfiends or are even married(pros and old school))
+
I didn't know if I was using that card correctly and I appreciate you clarifying that for me. Thanks for your help. If you ever stop by Teletraan-I with a transformers question, I'll be sure to return the favor. [[User:Xeno the Hedgehog|Xeno the Hedgehog]] 07:12, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
−
Second type Konami Yugioh Rules to google then on the first link
 
  
 +
== User's illegal move? ==
  
−
FIRST YOU MENTIONED THE FORTRESS DRAGON FIRST
+
I just noticed one user; [[User:Akisa|Akisa]] put up two copies of "Red Rose" in her User Page. Is that legal or not? --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 19:10, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
−
SECOND READ THE EFFECT WORD BY WORD, THERE IS A DIFFERENCE THE ORIGINAL ATK IS.
 
  
−
== hello ==
+
:Other members, like you, told them to not post any pictures that are relate to this site, and Akisa did with Red Roses... I am just making sure not get her in trouble for that. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 19:21, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
  
 +
:Alright, but other member said that's not allow to post any image that is relating to the site. I don't understand why you let her while other don't... --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 19:43, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
  
 +
::I mean, look at her current talk-page, Trivi-AM told her to not upload the picture in her user page. That's exact what I mean. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 19:56, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
  
 +
::Alright then, I will go poke Blue since you cannot do anything. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 11:57, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
  
  
 +
== thanks Man ==
 +
hey thanks man for answer me my question, ah! man if was possible unbanne me I will make contributions Tyrant Slayer Reform me --[[User:Zeratul 100|D@rk Crus@der]] 03:46, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
    i know you have a lot to do but can you write back?
+
:I don't know what he is talking about either. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 18:32, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
      thanks {{Unsigned|Nature101|08:39, November 13, 2009}}
 
−
 
 
−
== hi  ==
 
−
 
 
−
hi mr deus ex machina ive seen you around and could you have a convo with me?GBmaster 18:42, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
ok im fine because i dont use ICR either anyway im just wanting to add friends to my friend list in my user page, so what deck do you use?GBmaster 21:57, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
cool, in that case i have a question you know inbonable gladiator beast the quick play spell well,on yugioh 2009 (ds game)
 
−
the effect of this allowed me to send GB cards to the deck from the grave not just monsters, and it says just monsters on the card and the card text in the game,so is it a glitch or are they reprinting the spell.GBmaster 22:31, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== THANK YOU!!!!!! ==
 
  
 +
===krty===
 +
cheers, the nxt time you're on could you tell me how to access the rulings forum? ty
 +
--[[User:Blazen8|Blazen8]] 22:25, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
  
 +
== problem with userpage ==
  
 +
When I try to access my userpage, my browser says "page cannot be found". I don't have this problem when I click "my home", "my talk", etc., so why can't I access my userpage? [[User:Xeno the Hedgehog|Xeno the Hedgehog]] 19:08, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
 +
:Nevermind. I clicked my sig after posting this inquiry, and that worked. [[User:Xeno the Hedgehog|Xeno the Hedgehog]] 19:09, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
    yes i would like some help .....
+
==...==
  
 +
cheers init..
  
−
  i don't understand yu-gi-oh! one of my friends says "it should be called yu-gay-oh!", is this true that yu-gi-oh! is gay?
+
wait, u said summat about androshpinx and exxod. can u or cant u?
  
 +
== OCG Rulings Help! ==
  
−
    and don't get those rules for yu-gi-oh! and what are the rules?
+
Hi Machina! I saw what you are doing [[User:Deus_Ex_Machina/OCG_Rulings|here]] with the OCG rulings and I'm wondering if I can somehow help you! What can I do? I can add some of the old Rulings that are missing. Then you can re-check my changes (from he History page) and correct, or re-write them better (since, unlike me, you can read the Japanese language)! What do you think? [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 14:11, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
 +
*Perfect! I'll try to help you as far as I can in order to complete that board with OCG rulings! Thanks! :) [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 07:34, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
  
 +
== [[Card Rulings:Hourglass of Courage]] ==
  
−
    THANKS
+
''"This card's effect changes its [[Original ATK and DEF]]."''
  
 +
I can read this ruling either like [[Hourglass of Courage]] doubles its Original ATK to create its new Original ATK, or to create its new current ATK. Souldn't be better if we re-type it like "This card's effect changes its [[Original ATK and DEF]] to create a new current ATK." or something?
  
−
  R.HUDSON
+
[[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 17:21, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 +
:Ok, but what I actually wanted to say is that as it is worded right now, someone may get confused with after [[Hourglass of Courage]]'s effect's resolution its new doubled ATK becomes it Original ATK, or its Currect ATK.  
  
 +
:For example someone can read it like: "This card's effect changes its [[Original ATK and DEF]] <span style="color:green;">and its new doubled/halved ATK becomes its new '''Original''' ATK</span>." Thus if [[Megamorph]] is equipped while [[Hourglass of Courage]] has doubled its Original ATK (1100*2=2200 new '''Original''' ATK), then its new current ATK will become 4400 (2200*2 its current ATK after [[Megamorph]]'s resolution).
  
 +
:Also someone can read it like: "This card's effect changes its [[Original ATK and DEF]] <span style="color:red;">and its new doubled/halved ATK becomes its new '''Current''' ATK</span>." Thus if [[Shrink]] is equipped while [[Hourglass of Courage]] has doubled its Original ATK (1100*2=2200 new '''Current''' ATK), then its new current ATK will become 550 (1100/2 the double to its ATK by its own effect will disappear as a new effect that halves its ATK has affected it).
  
−
----
+
:What do you think! Should we re-write it better, or leave it as it is now? [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 20:33, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 +
::Ah! Ok then! We can instead inlude it as a note that has the link to the Wikia(J)'s ruling? [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 07:44, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 +
:::Perfect! We can add that as a note. [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 18:09, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
  
 +
== Field cards and Monster types ==
  
−
these r 2 ridiculously stupid questions..
+
My friend and I had a dispute recently about field cards whose effect states that a monster is treated as a specific type while said field card remains on the field; specifically Zombie World. Hypothetically speaking, when Zombie world is active, are monsters on the field and graveyard treated ''exclusively'' as zombie types, or are they treated as zombie types ''in addition'' to their default types? [[User:Xeno the Hedgehog|Xeno the Hedgehog]] 02:10, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
 +
:Thanks again! [[User:Xeno the Hedgehog|Xeno the Hedgehog]] 14:03, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
no 1, how can yugioh be gay? that doesn't even make sense..
+
== Magic Gate ==
  
 +
From reading the Japanese effect, can you tell if "??? [[Magic Gate]]" requires exactly 2 or 2 more Spellcaster-Type monsters to use? -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 01:17, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
  
 +
== OCG Rulings: Mentions in Other Rulings! ==
  
−
no.2, there are too many rules for this page, just get a rulebook..
+
From what I'm seeing the "Mentions in Other Rulings" have no use for the OCG Rulings since each ruling does not belong especially to a specific card (Unless the ''"Effect Monster > Kuriboh"'' rulings), so shouldn't be better if, for example, a ruling that mentions 2 (or more) cards be used as a main Ruling for both cards instead of as main Ruling for the one card, and "Mentions in Other Rulings" ruling for the other?
  
 +
Or we can place a ruling as "Mentions in Other Rulings" ruling only if a card is mentioned on an ''"Effect Monster > Kuriboh"'' ruling, as it happens with [[Trap of Board Eraser]]'s ruling!
  
 +
Thoughts?
  
−
no.3, if u have an account, sign out with it so that people can reply
+
EDIT: ''How many times did I said the word "ruling"?'' [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 06:43, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 +
:Hmm...ok! We can place some rulings as "Mentions in Other Rulings" with the criteria you said, at least until we find out a better way to organise them!
  
−
== My thoughts and tips upon Final Destiny Spell Card ==
+
:Well, I didn't said something in your thread because I wasn't messing up with the OCG Rulings thοse days so I hadn't faced this organisation problem before!
  
−
Dear Sir and Madam:
+
:[[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 00:46, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
After I've given a clear  and careful thought, I've finally come to a conclusion about Final Destiny Spell Card. The prerequisite to use it effectively is to use Infinite Cards Spell Cards on the Field, and use other quick deck drawing cards in order to gain hand advantages over your foes. If there's any more tips to this kind of strategy, please let me know asap, okay?
 
  
−
Thanks, bye!
+
==dark spirit art vs respect==
−
[[User:Fife5000|The Professional]] 20:32, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
 
  
−
==Flamvell Firedog==
+
[[Dark Spirit Art - Greed]] .. can it be negated by its own effect if Respect Play is on the field? koaki meru s cannot reveal if respect play is down so....
−
Does the activation of skill negate the effect of flamvell firedog {{Unsigned|72.201.79.78|08:02, November 14, 2009}}
 
  
−
== hi ==
+
ty
  
−
thanks that makes me feel better !
+
--[[User:Blazen8|Blazen8]] 19:44, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
  
 +
== [[Card Rulings:Lord of D.]] ==
  
−
question: why is seto sooooo evil to joey? why call him a "mutt"  
+
Hi! About the source of the TCG Rulings I thought that we are now placing Netrep, since it survived from its death, and not Yu-Judges anymore (exept for the Judge List Rulings). [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 06:48, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
−
r.hudson 21:34, November 14, 2009 (UTC)ruby
+
:Yes, but Netrep is an official source, unlike Yu-Judges. I suggest to use only Netrep (unless for the Judge List Rulings of course). [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 18:44, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
 +
::Yes, it is not "official"! I think Netrep was UDE's idea to keep a "backup" of the rulings, or something. I still believe that Netrep should be a better idea for the sources! [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 11:58, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
 +
:::Ok! Nevermind then! Shouldn't it be better to keep only 1 of those though? [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 21:16, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
 +
::::*shrug* ok then! :P [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 22:24, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
== Are You Sure? ==
+
== OCG Rulings: Treacherous Gofer ==
−
The text on [[Precious Cards From Beyond]] states that you draw two cards if you "...tribute summon or set a monster that required two or more '''tributes'''..." it doesn't specify that it has to be two monsters.--[[User:Dragonking|Dragonking]] 03:37, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
 
  
−
But the effect that applies considers to number of tributes to be two. Take money for example. a double tributer is like the ever rare two-dollar bill: it's a single bill, but the value is that of two dollars. Other types of summoning level 7+ monsters by tributing one monster like [[Tribute Doll]], go more along the lines of a discount in the metaphor, where you only pay one tribute/dollar for something worth two tributes/dollars.--[[User:Dragonking|Dragonking]] 21:41, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
+
Hello and good day, Sir
  
−
That's because [[Cloudian - Nimbusman]] counts by "'''monsters'''". [[Precious Cards from Beyond]] counts by "'''tributes'''". There's a small, hard to see, difference.--[[User:Dragonking|Dragonking]] 01:03, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
 
  
−
I answered this at here: http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Card_Rulings_talk:Precious_Cards_from_Beyond Wah-hey! =D --[[User:Horus-ra|Horus-ra]] 16:26, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
 
  
−
== hi again! ==
+
May I request for the OCG rulings of Treacherous Gofer to be added? I am interested if the rulings stated anything regarding this card's interaction with Stardust Dragon/Starlight Road
  
−
what do you think of yugi?
 
  
  
 +
http://yugioh.faq.konami.jp/EokpControl?&lang=en&tid=55842&event=FE0006
  
  
  
−
r.hudson 09:00, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
+
Thanks! [[User:Nggakboleh|Nggakboleh]] 10:47, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
== Korean backing ==
+
== Bad User Posted! ==
  
−
Do you know what's on the reverse side of Korean Yu-Gi-Oh! cards? Do they use the same backing as Japanese cards or maybe Asian-English? -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 20:32, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
+
Just look at latest post, I leave it alone to let you know what had happened. I think he serious need some judgment in court, by [[Judge Man]]. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 20:15, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
:That's okay. Thanks anyway. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 23:30, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
+
Just code number; 83.105.67.15, therefore unregistered user. Gotta hate him much for give me some shit. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 20:19, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
== Vayu & royal oppression ==
+
And if you not know where; <s>[http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:FredCat100#Your_a_Bitch]</s> as it's right above one you recent post. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 20:26, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
could you check that ruling query, cause i dont think its right...then again i could be wrong, but that why i came to you [[User:Marmka|Marmka]] 02:07, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
+
Indeed, he's very rude one. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 20:28, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
== yugi ==
+
== Locking Shooting Star Dragon ==
  
 +
Can you or blue or delta please lock Shooting Star Dragon down until other confirmed information is known?  People keep vandalizing the page with idiotic crap.  oh, and btw....love the voicemail deal on ur user page rofl thanx [[User:Hairball420|Hairball420]] 21:07, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
  
 +
:Just let you know that [[Shooting Star Dragon]] is confirmed to be Accel Synchro in current episode. [[Bruno|Dark Glass]] said so himself. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 17:18, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
i like yugi but i love yami yugi!
+
== Alien, Locked ==
  
−
do you like joey wheller ?!
+
I was trying to discuss that problem on the talk page. My "friends" YamiWheeler and Reiou_H refuse to stop editing the page before we come to a compromise and they just will not stop. Do you have any ideas? --[[User:LordGeovanni|LordGeovanni]] 20:54, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
−
r.hudson 16:31, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
+
:He already went to 1 mod and he turned him away, so now he's gonna take his pick with whoever he can get. No other pages are laid out the way he's trying to change it. Why do we have individual card pages if we're just going to plaster the stats on the Archetype pages, and remove valuable tips in the process?--[[User:YamiWheeler|YamiWheeler]] 20:56, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
== Judges forum rulings ==
+
How do I compromise when all they do on the talk page is bad-mouth me? I have been working on this for hours. They just don't stop. If I wait for their responce then I will never get one and the data i put on the page will never be placed back on the page for people to use. --[[User:LordGeovanni|LordGeovanni]] 21:06, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
Don't know if you've already noticed, but Yu-Judges also includes rulings from the Judges forum.
+
:I wasn't badmouthing you at first, but your sole argument is to promote laziness. You're destroying the layout of the site '''to promote laziness'''. Who do you think you are?--[[User:YamiWheeler|YamiWheeler]] 21:07, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
Are these rulings taken word-for-word or are they based on what was written by the Judges? I've seen a couple of minor mistakes (e.g. miscapitalising or leaving out hypens). Should we fix these these or leave them as they are?
+
::Laziness, and for people with slow computers. I think I am LordGeovanni. And this is for a Talk page not something to discuss on a user's private Talk. --[[User:LordGeovanni|LordGeovanni]] 21:12, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
Some of them are the same as the main TCG rulings. (e.g. the first one for "[[Card Rulings:Light-Imprisoning Mirror|Light-Imprisoning Mirror]]". Do we need to list them too? -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 04:30, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
+
::: *GONG*
 +
:::Sort it out on your own talk pages. Your argument is with each other, not me.
 +
:::YamiWheeler, regardless, you shouldn't be badmouthing people, even if you disagree with them. You're supposed to debate things out civilly.
 +
:::--[[User:Deus Ex Machina|Deus Ex Machina]] ([[User Talk:Deus Ex Machina|Talk]]) 21:13, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
== HI!!! ==
+
:::Fair enough! I won't be editing the page until we have it resolved, as per your dictation.--[[User:YamiWheeler|YamiWheeler]] 21:14, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
HI AGAIN DEAR FRIEND!!:)r.hudson 09:38, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
+
XD It's so great to watch them so mad at each other... I was just go there to teasing them for not being positive. But thanks for stop the fighting. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 21:21, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
== Worms ==
+
== Hidden Arsenal Skip-able ==
  
−
Looks like the first part of "[[Worm King]]'s" effect requires a Retiple-Type, so there seemingly goes the ability to Tribute "[[Dimensionhole]]" or "[[Electric Virus]]". But supposing, 1 was to use "[[DNA Surgery]]", selecting Reptile, would they be eligible in that case? Assuming these Worms get released in the TCG and someone was to combine "DNA Surgery" with a non-"ワーム" "Worm", like "[[Humanoid Worm Drake]]"... Should we change card texts to accomodate for these bizzare situations?
+
There's a forum I have asked about Hidden Arsenal's pack skipped. It is not asked. If you wanna know where it is, it's in discussion forum or just look at my Contributions page and see "Hidden Arsenal Skip...". Since I am curious why Arsenal skipped DT02. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 01:29, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
−
:''... 1 Reptile-Type "Worm" monster (other than "Humanoid Worm Drake"), Reptile-Type "Electric Virus", or Reptile-Type "Dimensionhole"
 
−
Or are we assume it to be the same case as Archfiends and players should just know what does and doesn't count? -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 01:19, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
 
  
−
== Face-down Attack Position ==
+
:Ok, thanks for your helps. I am just surprise that Konami is little crazy on that side. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 11:18, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
Hey. I heard that [[Darkness Approaches]] is the only case in which there can a face-down Attack Position monster, but what about [[Curse of Fiend]]? Its lore doesn't say that it switches to face-up Attack, just that it switches positions. This question suddenly hit me when I saw the [[Face-down]] page. Thank you for your time.[[User:PoirotH|PoirotH]] 06:25, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
+
== LADD vs Machina Fortress ==
  
−
== sorry:( ==
+
Hi, a quickly question cuz i have web problems.
 +
Can Light and Darkness Dragon negate the effect of "drestroy 1 card" by Machina Fortress when it is destroyed by battle?
  
−
[[File:Angel9.jpg|frame|hi]]hi
+
It is not an effect, but more the less an inherited summoning condition which DOES NOT FORM A CHAIN. So no, you wouldn't be able to negate Machina Fortress'es Summoning.
−
couldn't write to you last week because my mum took my laptop away!!!
 
−
sorry
 
  
−
Gaap the Divine Soldier vs curse of anubis/level limit area B what happen???
+
== [[Djinn the Watcher of the Wind]] ==
−
what battle postion the monsters????[[User:Daredevil^^|Daredevil^^]] 11:50, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
 
  
−
== Book Of Eclipse. ==
+
Hi Machina! Is that thing is a "Djinn" monster? From what I can translate it isn't. It doesn't matter much right now but if they release a card that interacts with Djinns then that thing could be a problem. Should we place a note, or a ruling linking [http://yugioh.faq.konami.jp/EokpControl?&lang=en&tid=26269&event=FE0006 to its name], saying that it is not a "Djinn" monster? Should we change its translated name? Unless it is a "Djinn" monster after all! Thanks! [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 10:29, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
 +
:Ok! Lets leave it as it is, at least until they release something that interact with "Djinn" monsters. [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 23:53, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
I have a normal monster face up on the field. My oponent have another. He activate "Ojama Trio". OK. Now i have 1 monster and 3 Tokens. The i activate "Book Of Eclipse". What Happens with the tokens ?  (Sorry for the bad english, im brasilian) [[User:Massinha4|Massinha4]] 17:39, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
+
== TCG Semi-Official Rulings ==
  
−
== [[Decoy Dragon]] ==
+
Hi! Could it be a good idea if we placed some important rulings, like the [[Drill Warrior]] vs [[Bottomless Trap Hole]], that are ruled by Kevin Tewart, or Jerome? [http://www.pojo.biz/board/showpost.php?p=17697236&postcount=81 Like this one from Pojo]. What about "Semi-Official (TCG) Rulings"? [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 18:59, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
 +
:Oh! You already did it days ago! lol! I didn't noticed it! Thanks! [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 19:21, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
Hey DXM, how have you been? Good I hope. Anyway I tried a tip on Decoy Dragon's Tip page (the fourth one down) on WC09 and is didn't work like it says it should. Is it a glitch in the game or is the tip inaccurate. [[User:D.Kaiser|D.Kaiser]] ([[User talk:D.Kaiser|Talk]] <small>•</small> [[:Special:Contributions/D.Kaiser|Contribs]] <small>•</small> [[:Special:EditCount/D.Kaiser|Count]]) 14:36, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
+
== ur name ==
−
* Yeah, that one. Thanks again for clearing that up. [[User:D.Kaiser|D.Kaiser]] ([[User talk:D.Kaiser|Talk]] <small>•</small> [[:Special:Contributions/D.Kaiser|Contribs]] <small>•</small> [[:Special:EditCount/D.Kaiser|Count]]) 03:09, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
 
  
−
== yo! ==
+
hey dues ex machina did u get that name from digitalph33rs machinima? <small>''—This unsigned comment was made by [[User:Church152000|Church152000]] ([[User talk:Church152000|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Church152000|contribs]]) 08:13, May 10, 2010''</small>
  
−
hey hows it going buddy? Thanks for the help with some of my question but and interesting point came up. Does Penguin soldier still target or does it  "choses a monster?" [[User:DeVast|DeVast]] 01:47, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
+
== Your word is so power ==
  
−
== I owe you an apology. ==
+
Thanks for honor my word, that's what I kept told him about edit part. >_> --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 04:19, May 11, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
In response to the message you left me, I did in fact realize that the ruling was unofficial as soon as I posted it.
+
== Vandal ==
  
−
I don't know what I was thinking. I must have been in a silly mood.
+
Forgive me if this is not the place to tell you this (I'm pretty new here) but [[Special:Contributions/24.170.229.116|an IP]] keeps on vandalizing the [[YUGI VS JADEN - BATLE - Transcript]] page. I don't know this wiki's policy on vandalism but I figured I should just alert someone, for now, I will just keep undoing the edits. --[[User:Insaneular|Insaneular]] <sup>[[User Talk:Insaneular|Talk]]</sup> 01:53, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
Anyway, so, I'm sorry I made a spammy mess that you had to clean up :-P.
+
== Weird contradict ==
  
−
It won't happen again. I wish there was some way to repay you.
+
:''"In the TCG, "Hundred-Eyes Dragon"is currently treated as a "Red-Eyes" card."''
  
−
I'm so sorry.
+
Is the really true? Where can this ruling be found?
  
−
--[[User:GoldenSandslash15|GoldenSandslash15]] 05:36, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
+
Can you use [[Red-Eyes Wyvern]] to special summon [[Hundred-Eyes Dragon]] from the graveyard?--[[User:Hide Head Turtle|Hide Head Turtle]] 00:56, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
==Rulings Knowledge==
+
What I mean is where is the official source for this ruling and does that mean that it is eligible for the Red-Eyes archtype support?
−
I have recently been registered as a Konami judge, and would like to become a top judge. I recognize you as someone who recognizes all rules, and understands all game mechanics. I would like to ask what you have done to become so knowledgeable of rulings and mechanics so that I may be just as competent. [[User:Messengerofthedark|DemonGodAsura]] 07:52, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
 
  
−
==Tragoedia Rulings TCG/OCG Differences==
+
(Of course, we're talking about the TCG.)--[[User:Hide Head Turtle|Hide Head Turtle]] 06:26, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
Hi,
+
Just reading it? I thought we follow the OCG ruling on names no matter what the names are in the TCG. One example would be Summoned Skull. You can select it for [[Battle-Scarred]] and you can also use it with [[Falling Down]].--[[User:Hide Head Turtle|Hide Head Turtle]] 03:06, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
I can't find an official source for TCG Rulings about Tragoedia vs Pachy, but here is a difference. o_O
+
== Hidden Arsenal 2 Confirm Lists ==
  
−
http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Card_Rulings:Tragoedia {{Unsigned|Yomifrog|20:13, December 13, 2009}}
+
I just noticed that one member listed up the names of cards without links (except for Prince) in that page, is that quite alright to post without any confirm? --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 14:04, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
==flip flop frog==
+
== monster gate and conscription ==
−
Hey man, could you clear this thread up please? http://yugioh.wikia.com/index.php?title=Forum:Flip_Flop_Frog_%3F&t=20091215215842
 
  
−
It's about whether or not [[flip flop frog]] is counted for it's own effect when destroyed by battle facedown.[[User:Yummyjelly|Yummyjelly]] 22:51, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
+
Hi, deus. I was wondering if i use monster gate and get jinzo, can i just special summon it or i must tribute 1 monster because jinzo is level 6. Since on monster gate description pick up until you get a monster that can be normal summon and special summon it, in order to normal summon jinzo i need to tribute 1 monster. How about conscription, is it same with monster gate.[[User:Omegamon|Omegamon]] 10:06, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
== Are you Italian? ==
+
Owh I see. About Conscription this is my situation, my opponent activate it and the card that picked up is Jinzo, is Jinzo been be special summoned to his field just like that or he need to tribute 1 monster? I said he does not have any monster so Jinzo is added to my hand. Is it correct?[[User:Omegamon|Omegamon]] 00:06, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
Hi, Deus Ex Machina. Are you Italian? Are there any forum where we can find you talking about Yu-Gi-Oh! rulings?
+
Really? He's gonna be mad at me. Anyway thankz Deus.[[User:Omegamon|Omegamon]] 00:18, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
== The LaDD effect can negate the effect of your own cards?? ==
+
== [[Card Rulings:Yubel - Terror Incarnate]] ==
  
−
Can the LaDD negate the effect of your own cards??? {{Unsigned|190.152.200.171|03:05, December 22, 2009}}
+
Can you please unblock this page? Thanks! [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 16:07, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
== Wikia(J)  ==
+
== Monster Effect-Types / Conditions ==
  
−
Can you translate what this note on Wikia(J) says exactly?:  
+
We have [[Summoning]] in the "Card Effect Type(s):" area, but how come we don't have [[Condition]]? (e.g. [[Exodia the Forbidden One]] isn't a Continuous Effect, but is a win condition, and [[Debris Dragon]] has Trigger/Continuous/Condition) [[User:Falzar FZ|Falzar FZ]] 10:01, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
※重要なお知らせ：近日サーバを移転するので、移転直前の編集部分に関しては反映されません。ご注意下さい。（移転日は早くて12/23、遅くても今週中には行える予定です。）
+
: ok. I thought it could have been something simple, like just calling it a "Condition" without the catagories, and then go on about it not being able to be negated by Skill Drain, etc. because it's not an effect. [[User:Falzar FZ|Falzar FZ]] 02:07, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
Thanks! [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 11:13, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
+
== 32 help! ==
−
*Ok thanks! I though they wanted to close the site or something! [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 01:08, December 26, 2009 (UTC)
 
  
−
== Second Coin Toss ==
+
Can you named cardS that can send multiple dark monster from deck to graveyard except painful choice and future fusion?[[User:Omegamon|Omegamon]] 13:06, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
I'm Dueling with a guy here. He is using Arcana Force. He is Discuting with me that Second Coin Toss negates the effect of a card once per turn, but that you can Activate it any times as you want in different cards. But i think it can only activate it once per turn in only one card. Who is correct ?  Sorry for the Bad English, i'm Brasilian. I Wish u understand. [[User:Massinha4|Massinha4]] 18:10, December 27, 2009 (UTC)
+
Owh...just think you might know...its okay...--[[User:Omegamon|Omegamon]] 23:48, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
== Croatian Translations ==
+
==RE:[[Card Rulings:Dark Armed Dragon]]==
 +
Im still a newbie please help me!
  
−
Man, you guys have a rel problem vith Croatian translations.
+
If I activate the effect the first time and my opponent Chains "Enemy Controller", then the effect of "Dark Armed Dragon" will still resolve properly and destroy the first card. However, I no longer control "Dark Armed Dragon", so you can't activate its effect a second time.
−
Can I help with that.
 
−
I am from Croatia and I made a lot of translations allready.
 
  
−
== Can you translate this? ==
+
1. But If the opponent has only 1 monster and I activate the effect of "Dark Armed Dragon" and selected the monster to be destroyed and he/she tributes the monster for the "Enemy Controller" and takes control of my "Dark Armed Dragon" can i still destroy 2 more cards If I have 2 more dark attribute monsters in my graveyard?
  
−
Or can you find someone to translate this:
+
2. If I use the effect of "Dark Armed Dragon" I removed from play a dark attribute monster as a cost and i haven't selected a target yet and my opponent activates "Enemy controller" to control my "Dark Armed Dragon" what will happen?
  
−
* Ｑ：《ファントム・オブ・カオス》でこのカードの効果のみをコピーしました。 この《ファントム・オブ・カオス》をシンクロ素材に使用する場合、手札のチューナー1体を使用してシンクロ召喚できますか？
+
[[User:CruzenX83|CruzenX83]] 16:04, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
−
Ａ：《ファントム・オブ・カオス》の効果で《エキセントリック・ボーイ》を対象にできるか、という時点で調整中です。（09/11/10）
 
  
−
I found it in the Tips for Eccentric Boy.[[User:PoirotH|PoirotH]] 11:56, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
+
Newbie here! [[User:CruzenX83|CruzenX83]] 16:18, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
Thank you for the help.[[User:PoirotH|PoirotH]] 06:17, December 31, 2009 (UTC)
+
What will happen if the opponent activates "[[Enemy Controller]]" and I chained "[[Raigeki Break]]" to destroy his/her only "[[Monster]]"?.
  
−
== easy translation look ==
+
[[User:CruzenX83|CruzenX83]] 13:25, June 3, 2010 (UTC) back with more questions!
  
−
Q: "Phantom of Chaos" has been copied from the only effect of this card. This "Phantom of Chaos" If the material used to synchronize the one hand you can summon synchro tuner to use the body?
+
1. If I normal summoned "[[Breaker the Magical Warrior]]" then my opponent activates "[[Bottomless Trap Hole]]" can I destroy 1 magic/trap card on his/her field?
−
A: "Phantom of Chaos" in effect "Boy eccentric" targeting ability, as it is being adjusted. (09/11/10)--[[User:Sartorias|Sartorias]] 12:00, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
 
  
−
@Sartorias: If you don't know about this, please don't translate it with online translator. It's the Card Ruling, so it should be case sensitive and clearly to understand. --[[User:Blackwings0605|Blackwings0605]] 14:54, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
+
2. If I summoned "[[Dark Creator]]" and my opponent activates "[[Bottomless Trap Hole]]" can still removed from play 1 dark attribute monster to summoned "[[Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon]]" and activate "[[Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon]]" effect to summon "[[Prime Material Dragon]]" and discard 1 card to negate the effect of "[[Bottomless Trap Hole]]" and destroy it?
  
−
== Question about Second Booster's effect ==
+
[[User:CruzenX83|CruzenX83]] 13:34, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 +
Question!
  
−
Ok, it's effect on this site it says "When the ATK of 1 monster you control is changed, you can Tribute this card to have that monster gain 1500 ATK." but according to Shriek's site it's effect [in OCG terminology] is ""Activate by Releasing this card, and selecting 1 face-up Attack Position monster you control. The selected monster gains 1500 ATK until the End Phase." and no where does it talk about anything changing, beyond the selected monster gaining 1500 ATK. So where did this site get the part "When the ATK of 1 monster you control is changed..." from?[[User:Altyrell|Altyrell]] 05:59, December 31, 2009 (UTC)
+
1. When I summoned "[[Dark Armed Dragon]]" and my opponent activates "[[Bottomless Trap Hole]]" how many cards can i destroy when I have 3 dark attribute monsters in my graveyard?
−
:*No problem, and any time[[User:Altyrell|Altyrell]] 14:00, December 31, 2009 (UTC)
 
  
−
== Question on Talk:Priority ==
+
[[User:CruzenX83|CruzenX83]] 14:44, June 3, 2010 (UTC) Question!
  
−
There was an [http://yugioh.wikia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Priority&diff=prev&oldid=902809 answer] given on [[Talk:Priority]], which I think was wrong, but I'd like to check with you first. "[[The Creator Incarnate]]", has an Ignition Effect, so when you Summon it you can call priority and activate it. Since Tributing itself is a cost, it gets Tributed before the opponent can chain anything. The opponent can't play "Bottomless Trap Hole" then because "The Creator Incarnate" is in the Graveyard. Is that right?-- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 15:02, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
+
1. If I summoned "Dark Creator" and my opponent activates "Bottomless Trap Hole" can still removed from play 1 dark attribute monster to summoned "Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon" and can I activate "Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon" effect to summon "Prime Material Dragon" and discard 1 card to negate the effect of "Bottomless Trap Hole" and destroy it?
  
−
== Success Probability 0% ==
+
2. If I summoned "Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon" and my opponent activates "Bottomless Trap Hole" and I activate "Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon" effect to summon "Prime Material Dragon" can I discard 1 card to negate the effect of "Bottomless Trap Hole" and destroy it?
  
−
Hey man wats up. Quick question, if I activate [[Success Probability 0%]] and my opponent has Fusion and Synchro Monsters, I'm pretty sure that they have to separate all the Fusions from their Synchros in their Extra Deck face-down in order for me to choose 2 Fusion Monsters. Is this correct? {{Unsigned|H-E-R-O HERO!!|07:28, January 8, 2010}}
+
== FredCat100 and GrouchMan ==
  
−
Thanks once again for clearing something up for me man. you rock out loud LoL!!
+
Can you stop them? They are fighting over war edits. [[User:Dark-Shimy|OMG! You did it]] 23:49, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
== GX manga parody ==
+
== Quick question ==
  
−
Hi, do you think you could help me with something, unless it's too much effort? How strong is your Japanese? There was a parody of Yu-Gi-Oh! GX printed in the V Jump magazine a few months ago. Yume o Idaku uploaded scans of it:
+
If I have a Jinzo equipped with machina gearframe and my opponent summons a Black rose dragon, the jinzo and the machina both are destroy or jinzo stays in play???? [[User:MobiusxXx|MobiusxXx]] 20:33, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
−
* http://yumeoidaku.info/GX/LOL/inu01.jpg
 
−
* http://yumeoidaku.info/GX/LOL/inu02.jpg
 
−
* http://yumeoidaku.info/GX/LOL/inu03.jpg
 
−
* http://yumeoidaku.info/GX/LOL/inu04.jpg
 
−
* http://yumeoidaku.info/GX/LOL/inu05.jpg
 
−
* http://yumeoidaku.info/GX/LOL/inu06.jpg
 
−
* http://yumeoidaku.info/GX/LOL/inu07.jpg
 
−
Other than what I've already told you, I don't know much about it. Do you think if you took a look at the scans we could get enough info to start an article about it? -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 16:48, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
 
  
−
:That's okay. Thanks. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 13:27, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
+
== OCG Rulings ==
  
−
== FL Light + Magical Dimension Review ==
+
I saw some pages (i.e: /078XX) haven't been written yet. Are you missing them? Or they're not really important to be noted? [[User:Blackwings0605|Blackwings0605]] ([[User talk:Blackwings0605|talk]]) 06:05, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
http://yugioh.wikia.com/index.php?title=Fortune_Ladies&diff=875140&oldid=873206
+
== Breakdown of the Battle Phase Q! ==
−
:About how you said "Removing the comment about "Magical Dimension" - that's currently under review." Is this review over yet? If it is, what was the result for it? (Asking since there have been different opinions put up there recently, some say it doesn't miss, some say it does miss.) [[User:Falzar FZ|Falzar FZ]] 23:48, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
 
  
−
== combo idea ==
+
In What step or substep a monster is consider have battled?
  
−
Is this legal? Say i played polymerization and fused material monsters then enter battle phase and attack with the fusion then activate de-fusion and split my fusion monster back into the fusion materials and attack once more with them, then i activate Super poly and fuse my monsters again and attack with the fusion monster. Is that a legal combo? lol [[User:DeVast|DeVast]] 23:57, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
+
When a Gladiator beast attack a Blast sphere face down and the blast sphere is attach. Can The gladiator beast activate is effect and return to the deck? [[User:MobiusxXx|MobiusxXx]] 02:12, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
  
 +
== Portuguese Digimon guy ==
  
−
==Arcana Force Rulings==
+
There a Portuguese guy on the wiki putting up Digimon articles. In Portuguese no less. Not only is he puttin gup information that has zero relevance to the wiki, he's also putting it up in a language most people here can't even read and he won't stop. Please stop him, he is [[User:Weslley D. Strait]].--[[User:Thanonyx|Thanonyx]] 01:01, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
−
All the users whom you left messages for are the same person, and have been identified as spammers. [[User:Messengerofthedark|DemonGodAsura]] 02:20, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
 
  
−
== Roid ==
+
== Infernity mirage Q! ==
  
−
The last sentence of Vehicroid Connection Zone said that "its effect cannot be negated" What's effect??? the effect of the spell card or the effect of monsters that were special summon from this card???[[User:Daredevil^^|Daredevil^^]] 15:06, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
+
I wanna use a D.D. Crow on infernity mirage effect to remove one of the targets.
 +
Okay, I read the ruling it's says if one of the targets is remove the remaining one will be special summon. Why this happens? when the card says 2 cards and one is remove the effect suppose to be canceled, or not? what about when it say's up to 2, same thing happen?[[User:MobiusxXx|MobiusxXx]] 05:17, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
== RE:Contradict on "Necrovalley" ==
+
== Hello ==
  
−
The contradiction was saying that [[Necrovalley]] in TCG can only negate effects that target cards in the Graveyard. But according to its second ruling it also negates (err, prevents) costs and effects that require removing cards from the Graveyard ([[Chaos Emperor Dragon - Envoy of the End]], [[Dark Necrofear]], ect)! Except the contradiction means something else that I missed! [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 20:14, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
+
Sorry, i wouldn't do that again.
−
:I don't think the ruling is worded that much incredibly badly as you're saying! I think the "''negate''" in the ruling is refereed to the "''effects that require removing cards from the Graveyard''" and not that much to the "''costs''". Of course costs cannot be negated (unless some exceptions), and that's why I said the "''(err, prevents)''". I said "negates" first because this is what the ruling says! By the way, [[Necrovalley]] can also negate cards that does not target cards in the Graveyard like [[Big Burn]], ect! [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 21:07, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
::Ah! Now I saw it! [[Necrovalley]]'s second effect! I was looking only to its first effect and I was wondering why [[Book of Life]] couldn't be able to be activated since it's not only affecting cards in the Graveyard, but it also targets them!
 
−
::And, with the missing of [[Necrovalley]]'s second effect, according to [[Big Burn]]'s ruling, it seemed that it could also negate cards that do not target cards in the Graveyard. The ruling says also "negate" instead of "prevents" which making the perfect confusion. lol!
 
−
::Hmm! I'm not seeing a ruling saying that [[Necrovalley]] can negate effects that do not target cards in the Graveyard, but since its text says "affects" instead of "targets" I guess that it should negate also effects that do not target.  
 
−
::By the way, it's fine with me to keep the contradiction if you want to!
 
−
::[[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 21:37, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
:::Ok! We keep the contradiction then! Thank you too! [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 21:56, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
 
  
−
==Wrong Rulings==
+
I just try the "edit" things :)
−
*There are some effects that are wrong in this page ,as Horus the "black flame dragon lv6" .Horus saiys that it is unaffected by spell so you can t use "monster reborn"to special summon it from your graveyard.(in wikia says =it is unaffectable while face up)in any part of the monster effect says this. {{Unsigned|190.173.92.136|19:03, January 23, 2010}}
 
  
−
== Thanks Alot.[[User:Gxthelord|Gxthelord]] 00:32, January 25, 2010 (UTC) ==
+
== . ==
  
−
Yeah,thanks alot about your previous reply regarding Reactors effects. But now I have another question,under its ruling. It does not negate the activation of trap card(Trap Reactor),so what happen if a mirror force is activated when Trap Reactor declares attack? Does it attacks resolve?
+
U say that most of the cards are like infernity mirage "if one of the 2 targets is remove the remaining will be special summon"
−
And can u tell me more about (sign your posts with four tildes [[User:Gxthelord|Gxthelord]] 00:32, January 25, 2010 (UTC)) where should I put the 4 tildes?
 
  
−
== Invitation ==
+
This ruling apply to Gottom's emergency call?, pot of avarice?, salvage?, Gladiator's Return?
  
−
Dear Duelist,
+
How I know when the ruling of infernity mirage apply to another card?
  
−
I would like in inform you that I have just created a duelist friendly and safe chat on my user page for duelist. I'm also asking if you would like to be a moderator for the chat. I, as the owner, have seen you about the boards all the time and would be honored if you would accept this position. I can see from experience you love/enjoy this game as much as I do and will work to helping other duelist who may not be as experienced as you. If you wish to decline this offer please feel free. If you would like to accept please leave me a message on my users page with the name you are going to be referred to on the Chat. Thank you and I hope to talk to you soon.
+
thanx and sorry to bother. [[User:MobiusxXx|MobiusxXx]] 03:34, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
  
−
--[[User:TheDivineDuelist|TheDivineDuelist]] 19:49, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
+
== Deck help? ==
  
−
== hi again ==
+
Could you please go to my Main Page and see the DED deck I have on there, and make any suggestions?--[[User:Yugioh DED|Yugioh DED]] 04:34, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
−
 
 
−
hey thankx for those tips last time,now I want to knw about how u put those box. The one with the Show button. For Monster,Spell,Traps.Those that are on the DECK HELP section.
 
−
Btw,wad you think about Harpies working alongside with Reactors? =) {{Unsigned|175.144.14.124|12:41, January 30, 2010}}
 
−
 
 
−
== Hi ==
 
−
 
 
−
Hi, I've seen that you've answered a lot of my questions here and I was just wondering if you're an official judge or something. And thanks for answering all those questions btw!
 
−
--[[User:CloudStrife768|CloudStrife768]] 04:09, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== Back to an old discussion: [[Card Rulings:Ancient Lamp]] ==
 
−
 
 
−
I'm seeing that you are using the yu-judges site as a source for the rulings. Now, should we get [[Ancient Lamp]]'s rulings too (since they appear to that site)? The (deleted) Geosites site didn't had them, which means that UDE didn't had them either when they lost Yu-Gi-Oh!. What we should do? [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 20:24, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
*Even if UDE (probably) deleted them? [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 20:41, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
**Ok! Should we list them as Semi-Official, or not? [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 21:03, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== Lava Golem Query ==
 
−
 
 
−
Player A has 2 monsters (1 is a face-up Dark Magician) and set S/T's. Player B goes to Special Summon Lava Golem. Would Player A be able to activate Eradicator Epidemic Virus to tribute his Dark Magician before Lava Golem would be Special Summon or would it be too late to activate EEV?[[User:Altyrell|Altyrell]] 21:19, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
Thank you Deus Ex.[[User:Altyrell|Altyrell]] 01:42, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== i know its correct ==
 
−
 
 
−
im only doing this so i could win a bet
 
−
 
 
−
== [[Junk Synchron]] + [[Gemini]]s ==
 
−
 
 
−
How's it going DXM? Good I hope. Anyway, I was working on a friends deck and a interesting question came up. If Junk Synchron special summons a Level 2 or 1 Gemini monster, does he negate its effects? I don't think it would due to the fact it has yet to gain it's effects but I was just looking for verification. Thanks for you time as always. [[User:D.Kaiser|D.Kaiser]] ([[User talk:D.Kaiser|Talk]] <small>•</small> [[:Special:Contributions/D.Kaiser|Contribs]] <small>•</small> [[:Special:EditCount/D.Kaiser|Count]]) 00:58, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== Question about Helios Monsters and Venom Swamp ==
 
−
 
 
−
Ok, how does [[Venom Swamp]] effect the Helios monsters? Cause i currently have [[Helios - The Primordial Sun]] on the field and it has 500 Atk/Def. What happens upon ending the turn?. I also have Caius (400) and Survivor (300), Gravekeeper's Servant, Dimensional Fissure, Soul Absorption and Venom Swamp active, and a face-down spell/trap.[[User:Altyrell|Altyrell]] 20:24, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
*Nvm, i solved it, lol had to re-look at Venom Swamp's effect.[[User:Altyrell|Altyrell]] 20:55, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== Special Chain will be Posted With Links To the Official Yugioh 5D's recent rulebook specifically under the name of Special Chain(Yugioh 5'ds) ==
 
−
 
 
−
[[User:Trascendent|Trascendent]] 22:57, February 17, 2010 (UTC)Ok i may have forgotten to add links to the official sources But
 
−
i will ask you How old are you? ill tell you why i ask you this is, because only immature actions like giving a warning to block/edit  an account, simply because "you" think the information is not authentic,
 
−
deleting a new complete yugioh wikia thread without any sources given than a simple "i think it's false" makes me wonder who is this person with 17k edits?
 
−
 
 
−
Let me give you an example I have 17k edits
 
−
and I saw your post that you copied and pasted right off the official new rulebook, im ignorant enough Not to have Grabbed and Red The latest Rulebook And So I Decide to Delete your Post Go through Your "My talk" Ignore 2 other Previous threads Stating Why, Your Post was Not removed and left there And then Give you a warning that if you do this again Ill Block Your account from edditing
 
−
 
 
−
Now would you like it, If 1 or more than 1 person did the exact same thing to u, Block from edditing your 17k Contrib Account?
 
−
Of course mine only has 30 i dont think ill ever reach 17k because i have better things to do but doesn't mean i dont like Yugioh
 
−
 
 
−
i will tell you what,a special chain is not googleable since the new rulebook was added in 2009 and noone has made any effort to do anything about it because the yugioh playing community has decreased  in the past few years
 
−
 
 
−
Now lets be clear here Information Its "NOT" False they have a source/base, the additional information i add its based on the Latest Original Yugioh Playing Cards Game
 
−
'''And Read Well''' i never make any ultimate descicions until i have Proven that the rule "goes" with the book
 
−
I Always ReFer to Forums like Konami Forums and Yugioh Wikia to understand the a rule better
 
−
 
 
−
Your Precious Wikia is not Ever gonna Be 100% Accurate BUT! It is the #1 Most Accurate Yugioh Card ruling website that you can find in google, so that would be make it about 99.8% accurate Yes we all try edit inaccurate information everyday to make wikia better but
 
−
we should not abuse the power we are given to bully other members, but instead try to build a better yugioh community based in morals and not Immaturity
 
−
Well i hope ive made a change for Next time you found someone you believe posted "FALSE" Information and warn them of bieng blocked of edditing
 
−
 
 
−
ok first of all get in your head that the only person that is probably trying to start an Edit war is you
 
−
second what we're doing right now is called "sorting out our differences" did you even realize that before you brought the word "edit wars" to the subject? anyway back to topic
 
−
When You refer To a website, you have to be more specific than just saying its KONAMI FAQ, After such an Irrelavant Conversation you finally get to the point (took you about 5 days), the site is directly linked to the official yugioh-card.com (the only site i trust) and the information is legit, that is all i wanted to know
 
−
i sure as heck dont know japanese, so couldn't read it
 
−
As long as the information comes from Yugioh-card.com then i can't say its wrong But my days of edditing are over for now i got more important thingss to do on my list
 
−
the site Is linked to Yugioh-card.com 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
I am willing to forget this ever happened http://www.yugioh-card.com/en/rulebook/V7_English_Rlbk_lores.pdf
 
−
[[User:Trascendent|Trascendent]] 22:57, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
[[Image:http://www.gatheringground.com/images/YGO-OfficialRulebook.jpg]]
 
−
 
 
−
== Frog Pictures ==
 
−
 
 
−
One member, who was recent new to this site, just put in pictures of frogs in this archetype; http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Frogs
 
−
 
 
−
Is that good pictures or are they pointless? He told me to not remove it from that link again. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 02:06, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
(Crying) Your words were so touchy... Thanks so much... I am glad you told him to take it slow. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 02:37, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
You're welcome, friend. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 04:07, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== Frogs ==
 
−
 
 
−
Im very mad of you because of the pictures that i dont want deleted.You don't ever remove pictures that i add on there,you got it.--[[User:Brandondorf9999|Brandondorf9999]] 02:21, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
==  Misspell ==
 
−
 
 
−
The word that went misspell in [[Magidog]]; ''heterochromia'', I think they're trying to say that the dog has two different color of irises... just check it in Trivia page. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 20:15, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
Ah, sorry, some dictionary don't find that word >_>; thanks for give me a point. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 22:19, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
Eh, it work for me on my page <_< --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 22:27, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== Sorry.. ==
 
−
 
 
−
about the edit in the rulings.. I was trying to understand something. [[User:Lon3wolf|Lon3wolf]] 07:12, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
==Help==
 
−
Can you help me to answer my question about alien dog Help in help deck???[[User:Daredevil^^|Daredevil^^]] 01:11, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== Compliments ==
 
−
 
 
−
Throughout all your archives of talk pages you have no compliments section.  Of course a lot of people compliment you on help with individual problems, but your work affects the larger community and deserves thorough recognition!<br/>
 
−
Thank you for all your "''It's usually better to ask questions on the Forum, since more people visit there. Also, remember to sign your posts with four tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, since that automatically creates a signature for you.''" because it is important that users know where to more easily find help.  Thank you for your 17 487 edits.  Thank you on behalf of the many people with ruling queries that you have solved. <br/>I hope more people will thank you. [[User:Clorth|Clorth]] 18:01, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== Questions about rulings ==
 
−
 
 
−
Check [[Forum:Lotz of queztionz|this]] page please. [[User:Lon3wolf|Lon3wolf]] 16:56, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== n/a ==
 
−
 
 
−
quit writing on my talk page your getting annoying kid
 
−
 
 
−
== Question about 2 Cards ==
 
−
 
 
−
Would [[Magical Thorn]] activate when the effect of [[Needle Worm]] activates?[[User:Altyrell|Altyrell]] 03:19, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== Stardust Dragon Assault Mode Effect ==
 
−
 
 
−
Is that true, his effect don't prevent those stuffs, like Sangan and Honest? I am just curious to see that from your point of view. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 00:51, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== question about rullings ==
 
−
 
 
−
Hi, i was wondering what was the ruling on gravekeeper's priestess cause her effect is to treat the field as necrovalley so wouldnt you get the boost of 500 attk and def?
 
−
 
 
−
== Rulings' Sources!  ==
 
−
 
 
−
Hi! Well, do you know how long will Netrep is going to live? From what I'm seeing it doesn't seem that it is going to close. So, I'm wondering, shouldn't be better if we continue to keep it as source of the TCG rulings until it closes, and then replace it with the yu-judges site?
 
−
 
 
−
Also, some ruling pages have some rulings from the JERP, or Wikia(J) and are placed as Semi-Official OCG ruling. Since we only keep the clear official rulings shouldn't be better to delete them? Here are some examples: [[Card Rulings:Deck Devastation Virus]], [[Card Rulings:Skull Lair]], [[Card Rulings:Total Defense Shogun]].
 
−
 
 
−
Thanks! [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 12:34, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
:So, I guess that we will continue to keep Netrep as a source of the rulings! (It also has been updated to have the newly released cards and rulings from CRMS, ANPR, ect, from what I'm seeing, but I think it is better to have Konami's official PDF pages as source for them instead of Netrep).
 
−
 
 
−
:Also, what about the Judge List's rulings from the yu-judges site? Should we keep those? I think it is better to keep them since they are official.
 
−
 
 
−
:About the Semi-Official OCG rulings I don't know if it is a good idea to keep any of them since they <u>aren't official</u>. But....nevermind! We can keep them if you want!
 
−
 
 
−
:[[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 22:37, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
::Ok thanks! [[User:ATEMVEGETA|<span style="color:red;">ATEMVEGETA</span>]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 22:58, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== "Hundred-Eyes Dragon" a "Red-Eyes" ==
 
−
 
 
−
Is capitalisation not taken into account when identifying monsters with a certain term in their name? i.e. "'''r'''ed-Eyes" v "'''R'''ed-Eyes". Considering how "roid" support cards always keep the "r" lowercase to match the card names. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 04:03, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== Fusion Sage ==
 
−
 
 
−
Fusion Sage says you can add 1 "Polymerization" Card from your deck to your hand. This will allow someone to add "Super Polymerization" to their hand. I'm just wondering if someone would be able to add Super Polymerization to their hand, or if Fusion Sage has been Errata to say otherwise?
 
−
 
 
−
I figured that. I just wanted to be sure. I'm trying to find ways to add Super Polymerization to my hand easier. So far Synchro Fusionist makes it easier.--The Eminent Hero 08:16, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== Hello and a message. ==
 
−
 
 
−
Hello. My name is LordGeovanni. i have an idea for this site that I would like you to look at. It is featured on my user page. The main concept is when a "recommended card list" is made, like on the [[Spell Counter Deck]] page, the cards have a reason why the card was added to the list. This prevents people having an edit war over what cards belong in the list. I have taken the advantage of using my idea on the [[Frog]] page due to multiple people arguing over [[Junk Warrior]] in this deck build. I ask that you, if you have the time, to take a look at the [[Frog]] page and please give me some feedback on my idea of spreading this to other pages. --[[User:LordGeovanni|LordGeovanni]] 05:10, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
* Thank you for your quich, honest responce. --[[User:LordGeovanni|LordGeovanni]] 05:27, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== Beat a D.D. Deck ==
 
−
 
 
−
Hi Dues Ex Machina. I was wondering if you had any ways to beat a Remove from Play/Monarch Deck. There's this annoying guy who uses cards like [[D.D. Survivor]] with other cards like [[Dimensional Fissure]] and uses Monarchs to clear my field. Do you know how to beat one? I don't have an Imperial Iron Wall... so it's hard to beat it... [[User:Trueman6=88|DARKnLIGHT808]] 01:52, March 17, 2010
 
−
 
 
−
== Thank you ==
 
−
 
 
−
I didn't know if I was using that card correctly and I appreciate you clarifying that for me. Thanks for your help. If you ever stop by Teletraan-I with a transformers question, I'll be sure to return the favor. [[User:Xeno the Hedgehog|Xeno the Hedgehog]] 07:12, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
== User's illegal move? ==
 
−
 
 
−
I just noticed one user; [[User:Akisa|Akisa]] put up two copies of "Red Rose" in her User Page. Is that legal or not? --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 19:10, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
:Other members, like you, told them to not post any pictures that are relate to this site, and Akisa did with Red Roses... I am just making sure not get her in trouble for that. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 19:21, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
:Alright, but other member said that's not allow to post any image that is relating to the site. I don't understand why you let her while other don't... --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 19:43, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
::I mean, look at her current talk-page, Trivi-AM told her to not upload the picture in her user page. That's exact what I mean. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 19:56, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
::Alright then, I will go poke Blue since you cannot do anything. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 11:57, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
== thanks Man ==
 
−
hey thanks man for answer me my question, ah! man if was possible unbanne me I will make contributions Tyrant Slayer Reform me --[[User:Zeratul 100|D@rk Crus@der]] 03:46, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
:I don't know what he is talking about either. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 18:32, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
 
−
 
 
−
===krty===
 
−
cheers, the nxt time you're on could you tell me how to access the rulings forum? ty
 
−
--[[User:Blazen8|Blazen8]] 22:25, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 22:29, 24 February 2011

Also see Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, 6, and 7.

Question[edit]

What cards can get a field spell from your deck/graveyard? I need help getting a field spell for my cloudian deck

Terraforming can get back any Field Spell Card from your deck.

Bunn3yTrade - YouTube

errrr[edit]

why is there a large negative nuber by this page on my wachlist?

Field Spell help[edit]

There are 2 that I have in my deck. I have Minefieldriller and Ancient Fairy Dragon. Synchro Star 21:12, April 28, 2010 (UTC)


Thank you[edit]

I didn't know if I was using that card correctly and I appreciate you clarifying that for me. Thanks for your help. If you ever stop by Teletraan-I with a transformers question, I'll be sure to return the favor. Xeno the Hedgehog 07:12, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

User's illegal move?[edit]

I just noticed one user; Akisa put up two copies of "Red Rose" in her User Page. Is that legal or not? --FredCat100 19:10, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Other members, like you, told them to not post any pictures that are relate to this site, and Akisa did with Red Roses... I am just making sure not get her in trouble for that. --FredCat100 19:21, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
Alright, but other member said that's not allow to post any image that is relating to the site. I don't understand why you let her while other don't... --FredCat100 19:43, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
I mean, look at her current talk-page, Trivi-AM told her to not upload the picture in her user page. That's exact what I mean. --FredCat100 19:56, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
Alright then, I will go poke Blue since you cannot do anything. --FredCat100 11:57, March 22, 2010 (UTC)


thanks Man[edit]

hey thanks man for answer me my question, ah! man if was possible unbanne me I will make contributions Tyrant Slayer Reform me --D@rk Crus@der 03:46, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

I don't know what he is talking about either. -- Deltaneos (talk) 18:32, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

krty[edit]

cheers, the nxt time you're on could you tell me how to access the rulings forum? ty --Blazen8 22:25, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

problem with userpage[edit]

When I try to access my userpage, my browser says "page cannot be found". I don't have this problem when I click "my home", "my talk", etc., so why can't I access my userpage? Xeno the Hedgehog 19:08, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind. I clicked my sig after posting this inquiry, and that worked. Xeno the Hedgehog 19:09, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

...[edit]

cheers init..

wait, u said summat about androshpinx and exxod. can u or cant u?

OCG Rulings Help![edit]

Hi Machina! I saw what you are doing here with the OCG rulings and I'm wondering if I can somehow help you! What can I do? I can add some of the old Rulings that are missing. Then you can re-check my changes (from he History page) and correct, or re-write them better (since, unlike me, you can read the Japanese language)! What do you think? ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 14:11, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

  • Perfect! I'll try to help you as far as I can in order to complete that board with OCG rulings! Thanks! :) ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 07:34, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Card Rulings:Hourglass of Courage[edit]

"This card's effect changes its Original ATK and DEF."

I can read this ruling either like Hourglass of Courage doubles its Original ATK to create its new Original ATK, or to create its new current ATK. Souldn't be better if we re-type it like "This card's effect changes its Original ATK and DEF to create a new current ATK." or something?

ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 17:21, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, but what I actually wanted to say is that as it is worded right now, someone may get confused with after Hourglass of Courage's effect's resolution its new doubled ATK becomes it Original ATK, or its Currect ATK.
For example someone can read it like: "This card's effect changes its Original ATK and DEF and its new doubled/halved ATK becomes its new Original ATK." Thus if Megamorph is equipped while Hourglass of Courage has doubled its Original ATK (1100*2=2200 new Original ATK), then its new current ATK will become 4400 (2200*2 its current ATK after Megamorph's resolution).
Also someone can read it like: "This card's effect changes its Original ATK and DEF and its new doubled/halved ATK becomes its new Current ATK." Thus if Shrink is equipped while Hourglass of Courage has doubled its Original ATK (1100*2=2200 new Current ATK), then its new current ATK will become 550 (1100/2 the double to its ATK by its own effect will disappear as a new effect that halves its ATK has affected it).
What do you think! Should we re-write it better, or leave it as it is now? ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 20:33, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
Ah! Ok then! We can instead inlude it as a note that has the link to the Wikia(J)'s ruling? ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 07:44, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
Perfect! We can add that as a note. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 18:09, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Field cards and Monster types[edit]

My friend and I had a dispute recently about field cards whose effect states that a monster is treated as a specific type while said field card remains on the field; specifically Zombie World. Hypothetically speaking, when Zombie world is active, are monsters on the field and graveyard treated exclusively as zombie types, or are they treated as zombie types in addition to their default types? Xeno the Hedgehog 02:10, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks again! Xeno the Hedgehog 14:03, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Magic Gate[edit]

From reading the Japanese effect, can you tell if "??? Magic Gate" requires exactly 2 or 2 more Spellcaster-Type monsters to use? -- Deltaneos (talk) 01:17, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

OCG Rulings: Mentions in Other Rulings![edit]

From what I'm seeing the "Mentions in Other Rulings" have no use for the OCG Rulings since each ruling does not belong especially to a specific card (Unless the "Effect Monster > Kuriboh" rulings), so shouldn't be better if, for example, a ruling that mentions 2 (or more) cards be used as a main Ruling for both cards instead of as main Ruling for the one card, and "Mentions in Other Rulings" ruling for the other?

Or we can place a ruling as "Mentions in Other Rulings" ruling only if a card is mentioned on an "Effect Monster > Kuriboh" ruling, as it happens with Trap of Board Eraser's ruling!

Thoughts?

EDIT: How many times did I said the word "ruling"? ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 06:43, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm...ok! We can place some rulings as "Mentions in Other Rulings" with the criteria you said, at least until we find out a better way to organise them!
Well, I didn't said something in your thread because I wasn't messing up with the OCG Rulings thοse days so I hadn't faced this organisation problem before!
ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 00:46, April 11, 2010 (UTC)


dark spirit art vs respect[edit]

Dark Spirit Art - Greed .. can it be negated by its own effect if Respect Play is on the field? koaki meru s cannot reveal if respect play is down so....

ty

--Blazen8 19:44, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

Card Rulings:Lord of D.[edit]

Hi! About the source of the TCG Rulings I thought that we are now placing Netrep, since it survived from its death, and not Yu-Judges anymore (exept for the Judge List Rulings). ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 06:48, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, but Netrep is an official source, unlike Yu-Judges. I suggest to use only Netrep (unless for the Judge List Rulings of course). ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 18:44, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
Yes, it is not "official"! I think Netrep was UDE's idea to keep a "backup" of the rulings, or something. I still believe that Netrep should be a better idea for the sources! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 11:58, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
Ok! Nevermind then! Shouldn't it be better to keep only 1 of those though? ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 21:16, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

OCG Rulings: Treacherous Gofer[edit]

Hello and good day, Sir


May I request for the OCG rulings of Treacherous Gofer to be added? I am interested if the rulings stated anything regarding this card's interaction with Stardust Dragon/Starlight Road


http://yugioh.faq.konami.jp/EokpControl?&lang=en&tid=55842&event=FE0006


Thanks! Nggakboleh 10:47, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Bad User Posted![edit]

Just look at latest post, I leave it alone to let you know what had happened. I think he serious need some judgment in court, by Judge Man. --FredCat100 20:15, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Just code number; 83.105.67.15, therefore unregistered user. Gotta hate him much for give me some shit. --FredCat100 20:19, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

And if you not know where; [1] as it's right above one you recent post. --FredCat100 20:26, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Indeed, he's very rude one. --FredCat100 20:28, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Locking Shooting Star Dragon[edit]

Can you or blue or delta please lock Shooting Star Dragon down until other confirmed information is known? People keep vandalizing the page with idiotic crap. oh, and btw....love the voicemail deal on ur user page rofl thanx Hairball420 21:07, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Just let you know that Shooting Star Dragon is confirmed to be Accel Synchro in current episode. Dark Glass said so himself. --FredCat100 17:18, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Alien, Locked[edit]

I was trying to discuss that problem on the talk page. My "friends" YamiWheeler and Reiou_H refuse to stop editing the page before we come to a compromise and they just will not stop. Do you have any ideas? --LordGeovanni 20:54, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

He already went to 1 mod and he turned him away, so now he's gonna take his pick with whoever he can get. No other pages are laid out the way he's trying to change it. Why do we have individual card pages if we're just going to plaster the stats on the Archetype pages, and remove valuable tips in the process?--YamiWheeler 20:56, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

How do I compromise when all they do on the talk page is bad-mouth me? I have been working on this for hours. They just don't stop. If I wait for their responce then I will never get one and the data i put on the page will never be placed back on the page for people to use. --LordGeovanni 21:06, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

I wasn't badmouthing you at first, but your sole argument is to promote laziness. You're destroying the layout of the site to promote laziness. Who do you think you are?--YamiWheeler 21:07, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
Laziness, and for people with slow computers. I think I am LordGeovanni. And this is for a Talk page not something to discuss on a user's private Talk. --LordGeovanni 21:12, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
*GONG*
Sort it out on your own talk pages. Your argument is with each other, not me.
YamiWheeler, regardless, you shouldn't be badmouthing people, even if you disagree with them. You're supposed to debate things out civilly.
--Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 21:13, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
Fair enough! I won't be editing the page until we have it resolved, as per your dictation.--YamiWheeler 21:14, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

XD It's so great to watch them so mad at each other... I was just go there to teasing them for not being positive. But thanks for stop the fighting. --FredCat100 21:21, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Hidden Arsenal Skip-able[edit]

There's a forum I have asked about Hidden Arsenal's pack skipped. It is not asked. If you wanna know where it is, it's in discussion forum or just look at my Contributions page and see "Hidden Arsenal Skip...". Since I am curious why Arsenal skipped DT02. --FredCat100 01:29, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for your helps. I am just surprise that Konami is little crazy on that side. --FredCat100 11:18, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

LADD vs Machina Fortress[edit]

Hi, a quickly question cuz i have web problems. 

Can Light and Darkness Dragon negate the effect of "drestroy 1 card" by Machina Fortress when it is destroyed by battle?

It is not an effect, but more the less an inherited summoning condition which DOES NOT FORM A CHAIN. So no, you wouldn't be able to negate Machina Fortress'es Summoning.

Djinn the Watcher of the Wind[edit]

Hi Machina! Is that thing is a "Djinn" monster? From what I can translate it isn't. It doesn't matter much right now but if they release a card that interacts with Djinns then that thing could be a problem. Should we place a note, or a ruling linking to its name, saying that it is not a "Djinn" monster? Should we change its translated name? Unless it is a "Djinn" monster after all! Thanks! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 10:29, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

Ok! Lets leave it as it is, at least until they release something that interact with "Djinn" monsters. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 23:53, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

TCG Semi-Official Rulings[edit]

Hi! Could it be a good idea if we placed some important rulings, like the Drill Warrior vs Bottomless Trap Hole, that are ruled by Kevin Tewart, or Jerome? Like this one from Pojo. What about "Semi-Official (TCG) Rulings"? ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 18:59, May 8, 2010 (UTC)

Oh! You already did it days ago! lol! I didn't noticed it! Thanks! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 19:21, May 8, 2010 (UTC)

ur name[edit]

hey dues ex machina did u get that name from digitalph33rs machinima? —This unsigned comment was made by Church152000 (talk • contribs) 08:13, May 10, 2010

Your word is so power[edit]

Thanks for honor my word, that's what I kept told him about edit part. >_> --FredCat100 04:19, May 11, 2010 (UTC)

Vandal[edit]

Forgive me if this is not the place to tell you this (I'm pretty new here) but an IP keeps on vandalizing the YUGI VS JADEN - BATLE - Transcript page. I don't know this wiki's policy on vandalism but I figured I should just alert someone, for now, I will just keep undoing the edits. --Insaneular Talk 01:53, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Weird contradict[edit]

"In the TCG, "Hundred-Eyes Dragon"is currently treated as a "Red-Eyes" card."

Is the really true? Where can this ruling be found?

Can you use Red-Eyes Wyvern to special summon Hundred-Eyes Dragon from the graveyard?--Hide Head Turtle 00:56, May 20, 2010 (UTC)

What I mean is where is the official source for this ruling and does that mean that it is eligible for the Red-Eyes archtype support?

(Of course, we're talking about the TCG.)--Hide Head Turtle 06:26, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Just reading it? I thought we follow the OCG ruling on names no matter what the names are in the TCG. One example would be Summoned Skull. You can select it for Battle-Scarred and you can also use it with Falling Down.--Hide Head Turtle 03:06, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Hidden Arsenal 2 Confirm Lists[edit]

I just noticed that one member listed up the names of cards without links (except for Prince) in that page, is that quite alright to post without any confirm? --FredCat100 14:04, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

monster gate and conscription[edit]

Hi, deus. I was wondering if i use monster gate and get jinzo, can i just special summon it or i must tribute 1 monster because jinzo is level 6. Since on monster gate description pick up until you get a monster that can be normal summon and special summon it, in order to normal summon jinzo i need to tribute 1 monster. How about conscription, is it same with monster gate.Omegamon 10:06, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Owh I see. About Conscription this is my situation, my opponent activate it and the card that picked up is Jinzo, is Jinzo been be special summoned to his field just like that or he need to tribute 1 monster? I said he does not have any monster so Jinzo is added to my hand. Is it correct?Omegamon 00:06, May 24, 2010 (UTC)

Really? He's gonna be mad at me. Anyway thankz Deus.Omegamon 00:18, May 24, 2010 (UTC)

Card Rulings:Yubel - Terror Incarnate[edit]

Can you please unblock this page? Thanks! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 16:07, May 24, 2010 (UTC)

Monster Effect-Types / Conditions[edit]

We have Summoning in the "Card Effect Type(s):" area, but how come we don't have Condition? (e.g. Exodia the Forbidden One isn't a Continuous Effect, but is a win condition, and Debris Dragon has Trigger/Continuous/Condition) Falzar FZ 10:01, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

ok. I thought it could have been something simple, like just calling it a "Condition" without the catagories, and then go on about it not being able to be negated by Skill Drain, etc. because it's not an effect. Falzar FZ 02:07, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

32 help![edit]

Can you named cardS that can send multiple dark monster from deck to graveyard except painful choice and future fusion?Omegamon 13:06, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Owh...just think you might know...its okay...--Omegamon 23:48, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Card Rulings:Dark Armed Dragon[edit]

Im still a newbie please help me!

If I activate the effect the first time and my opponent Chains "Enemy Controller", then the effect of "Dark Armed Dragon" will still resolve properly and destroy the first card. However, I no longer control "Dark Armed Dragon", so you can't activate its effect a second time.

1. But If the opponent has only 1 monster and I activate the effect of "Dark Armed Dragon" and selected the monster to be destroyed and he/she tributes the monster for the "Enemy Controller" and takes control of my "Dark Armed Dragon" can i still destroy 2 more cards If I have 2 more dark attribute monsters in my graveyard?

2. If I use the effect of "Dark Armed Dragon" I removed from play a dark attribute monster as a cost and i haven't selected a target yet and my opponent activates "Enemy controller" to control my "Dark Armed Dragon" what will happen? 

CruzenX83 16:04, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Newbie here! CruzenX83 16:18, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

What will happen if the opponent activates "Enemy Controller" and I chained "Raigeki Break" to destroy his/her only "Monster"?.

CruzenX83 13:25, June 3, 2010 (UTC) back with more questions!

1. If I normal summoned "Breaker the Magical Warrior" then my opponent activates "Bottomless Trap Hole" can I destroy 1 magic/trap card on his/her field?

2. If I summoned "Dark Creator" and my opponent activates "Bottomless Trap Hole" can still removed from play 1 dark attribute monster to summoned "Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon" and activate "Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon" effect to summon "Prime Material Dragon" and discard 1 card to negate the effect of "Bottomless Trap Hole" and destroy it?

CruzenX83 13:34, June 3, 2010 (UTC) Question!

1. When I summoned "Dark Armed Dragon" and my opponent activates "Bottomless Trap Hole" how many cards can i destroy when I have 3 dark attribute monsters in my graveyard?

CruzenX83 14:44, June 3, 2010 (UTC) Question!

1. If I summoned "Dark Creator" and my opponent activates "Bottomless Trap Hole" can still removed from play 1 dark attribute monster to summoned "Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon" and can I activate "Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon" effect to summon "Prime Material Dragon" and discard 1 card to negate the effect of "Bottomless Trap Hole" and destroy it?

2. If I summoned "Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon" and my opponent activates "Bottomless Trap Hole" and I activate "Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon" effect to summon "Prime Material Dragon" can I discard 1 card to negate the effect of "Bottomless Trap Hole" and destroy it?

FredCat100 and GrouchMan[edit]

Can you stop them? They are fighting over war edits. OMG! You did it 23:49, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

Quick question[edit]

If I have a Jinzo equipped with machina gearframe and my opponent summons a Black rose dragon, the jinzo and the machina both are destroy or jinzo stays in play???? MobiusxXx 20:33, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

OCG Rulings[edit]

I saw some pages (i.e: /078XX) haven't been written yet. Are you missing them? Or they're not really important to be noted? Blackwings0605 (talk) 06:05, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

Breakdown of the Battle Phase Q![edit]

In What step or substep a monster is consider have battled?

When a Gladiator beast attack a Blast sphere face down and the blast sphere is attach. Can The gladiator beast activate is effect and return to the deck? MobiusxXx 02:12, June 11, 2010 (UTC)

Portuguese Digimon guy[edit]

There a Portuguese guy on the wiki putting up Digimon articles. In Portuguese no less. Not only is he puttin gup information that has zero relevance to the wiki, he's also putting it up in a language most people here can't even read and he won't stop. Please stop him, he is User:Weslley D. Strait.--Thanonyx 01:01, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Infernity mirage Q![edit]

I wanna use a D.D. Crow on infernity mirage effect to remove one of the targets. Okay, I read the ruling it's says if one of the targets is remove the remaining one will be special summon. Why this happens? when the card says 2 cards and one is remove the effect suppose to be canceled, or not? what about when it say's up to 2, same thing happen?MobiusxXx 05:17, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

Sorry, i wouldn't do that again.

I just try the "edit" things :)

.[edit]

U say that most of the cards are like infernity mirage "if one of the 2 targets is remove the remaining will be special summon"

This ruling apply to Gottom's emergency call?, pot of avarice?, salvage?, Gladiator's Return?

How I know when the ruling of infernity mirage apply to another card?

thanx and sorry to bother. MobiusxXx 03:34, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

Deck help?[edit]

Could you please go to my Main Page and see the DED deck I have on there, and make any suggestions?--Yugioh DED 04:34, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://yugipedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Deus_Ex_Machina/Archive8&oldid=1309300"