Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jon Kovacs"

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Okay, you got me: new section)
Line 123: Line 123:
  
 
You made sense with your "work with the staples to see how they work so you can find more compatible substitutes" argument, and now that I'm on the Dueling Network, I can do that. I guess I can let you edit my decks, now, on that principle. Cool? [[User:SynjoDeonecros|SynjoDeonecros]] ([[User talk:SynjoDeonecros|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SynjoDeonecros|contribs]]) 20:05, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
 
You made sense with your "work with the staples to see how they work so you can find more compatible substitutes" argument, and now that I'm on the Dueling Network, I can do that. I guess I can let you edit my decks, now, on that principle. Cool? [[User:SynjoDeonecros|SynjoDeonecros]] ([[User talk:SynjoDeonecros|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SynjoDeonecros|contribs]]) 20:05, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
{{Decklist| '☥''☥''☥'In the Arms of Anubis'☥''☥''☥'
 +
|color = Black
 +
|color2 = Gold
 +
|monsters =
 +
* [[The End of Anubis]] x2
 +
* [[Mystical Knight of Jackal]] x2
 +
* [[Ghost Knight of Jackal]] x2
 +
* [[Emperor Sem]] x2
 +
* [[Protector of the Sanctuary]] x2
 +
* [[Morphing Jar]] x1
 +
* [[X-Saber Airbellum]] x2
 +
* [[X-Saber Uruz]] x2
 +
* [[Twin-Headed Wolf]] x2
 +
* [[Pitch-Black Warwolf]] x2
 +
* [[Sangan]] x1
 +
 +
|spells =
 +
* [[Deck Lockdown]] x2
 +
* [[Into the Void]] x2
 +
* [[Forbidden Graveyard]] x2
 +
* [[Mystical Space Typhoon]] x2
 +
* [[Fiend's Sanctuary]] x2
 +
* [[Back to Square One]] x2
 +
* [[Ruthless Denial]] x3
 +
 +
 +
|traps =
 +
* [[Dark Bribe]] x2
 +
* [[Judgment of Anubis]] x2
 +
* [[Curse of Anubis]] x2
 +
* [[Dark Coffin]] x3
 +
* [[Reckless Greed]] x2
 +
* [[Raigeki Break]] x2
 +
}}

Revision as of 00:09, 26 May 2011

Leave a message after the beep. Beeeep.... Jon Kovacs (talkcontribs) 23:24, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Hey

Hey, I truly regret that we were on opposite sides of the argument over the Gravekeeper's article. No hard feelings?

Nobody- (talkcontribs) 00:58, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

Request Question

Hey Jon,

I don't suppose you've got any traditional FTK deck lists about? as I know many exist, I just never get a chance to make them, & the "Request :) Traditional Remove From Play Deck" person would like one,

thanks

-Resk (Talk) 14:22, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

RE: FTK

Yo,

Searching for help seems fine, & frogs should work, though less sure if the FTK is as consistant with Toad at 1, but that should do for him, ty

-Resk (Talk) 10:24, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

DFF

Hey, could I help on Decks For Free as a deck builder? It's O.K. if you refuse. --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 22:25, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

Gravekeeper's

Here's my "Job Interview".

--Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 19:56, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

Well, thank you for being an elitist

Resk apparently had absolutely no problem helping me with my Tiger deck, so I don't see how my latest post should've been any problem. And frankly, you're just an archiver, NOT one of the deckbuilders or administrators for that thread, so I doubt you DO have the authority to delete any posts from there. But fine, if you want to get a bug up your craw over it, I'll delete BOTH of my posts from that board, just to make you happy. Just be warned that, if you ever come into my deck threads offering me advice, I will consider it an act of trolling and not only delete your post, as is MY right as the threadmaker, but will also be reported. Thank you and have a nice day. 74.99.243.201 (talk) 02:13, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

You honestly do not know the history of the page. The only reason that the page is still going is because I kept it running when the original 5-6 deckbuilders retired for various reasons. The title used to take Archive Curator/Deckbuilder, which I shortened when other, when there were other deckbuilders joined the page. Had I saw that you were using an IP on the previous post, I would have reminded you to use an account there as well. Also, if you want to accuse someone of being elitist, at the very least you could avoid talking down to them by saying "you're just an archiver, NOT one of the deckbuilders or administrators for that thread." The reason that Tantara's name has "administration" listed next to it is because he created Forum:Decks for free!. Jon Kovacs (talkcontribs) 02:22, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
And you do not have to worry about me posting on your forum threads, I do not have time to go on to other forum pages anyway. Jon Kovacs (talkcontribs) 02:24, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
Which makes him more qualified to tell me what I can and cannot do in that page than you are, idiot; all you do is archive the pages, I've seen Resk do more to help with deckbuilding on there than you, so yeah, as far as I can see, you are just blowing this out of your rear. And if you are so goddamned insistent on taking off every request that isn't made by a registered member, WHY THE HELL ARE YOU UNDOING MY DELETION OF THE TIGER BILLY DECK REQUEST?! One, it breaks the rules you supposedly uphold, and two, I've already stated in my last edit that it WAS MINE, just under an old IP that was changed, recently. So, as far as I'm concerned, you're just a troll trying to act like a big shot on there, and if you restore the deleted request again, I'll report you for trolling. 74.99.243.201 (talk) 02:33, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
First, I will not contest that Resk is a more qualified deckbuilder, and obviously you have seen him do more deckbuilding, because you said yourself that I am not a deckbuilder. That is not the issue here. Second, the reason that I kept restoring the post is because he had already built the deck. By removing it, you take away the chance for another user to see it in the archives or deck galleries, which saves everyone's time and energy. I just doing my job on the forum page. Jon Kovacs (talkcontribs) 02:40, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
Also, if you are referring to Tantara as having the authority to tell you what you could or could not do on the page, you are right, but if you didn't notice, his name says Retired next to it. Jon Kovacs (talkcontribs) 02:45, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks, for giving me the chance. --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 02:32, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Decks for Free

Could I be a deckbuilder for Decks for Free?BobaFett2 (talk)

DFF Heirachy,

Yo Jon,

I was thinking about this for a while, but having just noticed the,,, discussion slightly further up, might be an idea to alter titles slightly,

IE: You're managment/curator/deckbuilder , Ace & I are deckbuilders OFC, & we should probably update the line of

"for more information or questions concerning this page, please visit my talk page. --Tantara (talk) 23:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC)",

to say to contact you or I :3

yes/no?

-Resk ✩ (Talk) 19:13, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Resk has a point there. The guy with the billy build was well... Need I say more? --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 19:50, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Archive 8

Hey Jon, the dragunity deck in archive 8 has problems, anything that can be done? Decklist won't work right, and you might want to reply to Bobafett2. Sorry if I'm being rude in posting this. --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 03:05, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Decks_for_free!/Archive8#Finished_-_Dragunity_Deck

Is anyone "banned" from requesting on DFF? I bring this to your attention because there are some users who just won't accept what would make sense to make a "good" deck (aka, they won't accept the high level of quality from DFF due to personal issues with cards as simple as MST) and so a particular user has been rejecting stuff just because he doesn't agree with and then being rude and calling people elitist while claiming that it's a flame war (I think you have experience with this user, SynjoDeonecros).BobaFett2 (talk)


I don't think that you're ignoring me, but perhaps you could reply to me about being a DFF Deckbuilder?BobaFett2 (talk)

Hey Jon, you put some unfinished decks in the Archives. (Agent Deck and D.D. Swarm). Is TSD still working on that deck, or should someone else take that? --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 03:01, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, you got me

You made sense with your "work with the staples to see how they work so you can find more compatible substitutes" argument, and now that I'm on the Dueling Network, I can do that. I guess I can let you edit my decks, now, on that principle. Cool? SynjoDeonecros (talkcontribs) 20:05, May 25, 2011 (UTC)