Forum:What archtype/type do you want more support for?
| Forums: | Index → General Yu-Gi-Oh! Discussion → What archtype/type do you want more support for? Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 3581 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
I have always wanted Konami to treat all types of cards with equal support, but several archetypes have been left behind, like Insects, Dark World, Elemental Heros (joking), Sea Serpents, WATER in general, Fish, Harpies, Venom, Dinosaurs, etc. Some of which has a ton of OCG support, but they were never realesed in the TCG.
I wanted to hear your opinion because the unfair advantage of DARK monsters, LIGHT monsters, and other types makes me mad. I personally hope for more DW and Venom support, to make it more competitive. What say you? --bewk (talk | contribs) 19:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Harpies and Venom monsters. I don't play either, nor do I intend to. But I dislike the fact that both Archetypes have been really left behind by cardmakers. Type-wise, I think Reptiles in general have been grossly unsupported.
~Specter (cow_pi) 20:38, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- I completely agree. Konami gives some archetypes a huge amount of fan service lol, while leaving others to die in the trade binders. --bewk (talk | contribs) 20:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Elegantly put. None of these under-supported archetypes are ones that I personally support, but I still have to pity them and their unfortunate fan-base.
~Specter (cow_pi) 21:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
I think Fish need more support. I love my Fish OTK deck (though it's a bit inconsistent). Animedude3000 21:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ancient Gears (More LV 4 or lower monsters), Gravekeepers (need some High LV monsters besides The End of Anubis), Venoms, and Volcanics. What's needed? Gemenis, Synchros, Tuners, Unions, etc. and Draw Cards, like Solar Recharge for Lightsworns or better yet, Gladiator Proving Ground-like and Gladiator Beast's Respite-like cards. What may be nice are some more Mirror Force-like cards and some more combo-based cards.Oh! And I think Sea Serpents have been neglected so some more Levia Dragon-based cards may be nice... Dmaster (Talk • Contribs • Count) 22:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
I disagree that Synchro monsters are under-supported. In fact, I would assert that anti-Synchro measures are under-supported. I do agree that we need more 4-star Ancient Gears.
~Specter (cow_pi) 23:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'd say Crystal Beasts (although that'll never happen), Burn, and a bit of Lightsworn. That's just my take, though. --Darth Covah (Talk | Contribs) 23:32, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Contents
Okai
so they is no suppor for hapies or for gravekeepers cuz they se, probably that they are not popular or faster, they need some cards to make the duel fast and get good cards at the same time but LS and GB they end the support for them but they still being so good that everyone or almost everyone are playing it, but the new archetypes aare CUMing:)LOL, for thos who sadi that there is more light and dark support, that why koaki meru is made to counter thos archetyps dont you think?GenoBreaker 00:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
I say they should give support to good old cards such as Gate Guardian, Valkyrion and pals, as well as some archetypes such as Archfiends (monsters with actual use and no risks) and most importantly forgotten Archetypes such as Mokey-Mokey and Machiners (I mean,if they're so useless, why did they release them anyway and not give them future support?). Also, MOAR anti-meta, as well as additional FIRE support and bringing back Fusion monsters. I haven't seen a single new one since Multiple Piece Golem. Speaking of golems, whatever happened to deffensive gameplay? We need more Rocks. Too much agressive gameplay needs to be cooled down for those who like to play passively.Doczo 04:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- The old warrior support thats non archetype is something I would like to see back into the game. Warrior decks are just about one of my favorite deck types so maybe they will give them some support. (And un limit Rota =.=). Blackwings are fun for me but a lot of their cards are absolute garbage, Against wind and the like..So I hope they come out with something extremely good. (My perfect choice would be a Blackwing monster that helps with blackwing search+has a destruction effect like Lyla.)--Takuma. 04:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Destiny Heroes and Evil Heroes
--I want these archtypes to have more support,i mean even if it still need the help of their Co-Hero(HAHAHA),i think they are the most dependent.I want them to have more Fusion monsters,or even a Synchro monster,and also a Field Searcher,i mean Elemental Hero has Elemental Hero Captain Gold,what is for Destiny Heroes???And for how about for Evil Heroes that doesn't even have there own field???But i guest i can't blame anyone if these heroes also need help.
--Jampong 17:49, 29 April 2009
does anybody else think that the original Elemental Heros have been left behind? They keep making new heros and hero support, and fusions that have little to do with the originals.
~Specter (cow_pi) 17:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Hmm...
I think I'm going to stick with Reptiles. They lack even a basic field spell card, and have no fusion monsters.
~Specter (cow_pi) 17:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
I want to see support for the Piece Golem Archtype! At least some spell and traps that help them....
I want to see the Dark Rainbow Dragon helped as well. Dark Rainbow Dragon is for a dark deck, but they should make the "aggressive" crystal beasts!Iam8bit 05:16, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Crystal Beasts!!!
They should take back all the crappy crystal beast supports such as rainbow dragon and some crappy traps( gem flash energy? Crystal Pair? R u kidding me?) and put in something like crystal beast diamond bear, discard this card to move rainbow city ancient ruin to your hand. And something like crystal clash(spell prefered), destroy one crystal beast you control to destroy 2 cards on the field. And make rainbow city ancient ruins' 3rd negation effect to spell speed 3. Metagame.com 07:16, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
I disagree
I play Crystal Beasts, and they work just fine to me. I think it's one of my undefeated decks. I think that Crystal Beast decks are plenty powerful, and have adequate support. The challenge is in designing an effective deck to duel with.
~Specter (cow_pi) 18:15, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Assault Mode
What's up with only Crimson Crisis "supporting" Assault modes. In Raging battle i see no cards that support this theme? And with dinosaurs, i think it's lame that they were not even helped out in any booster set...they really are insane!
Justjaice 19:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC)justjaice
I think there is already a fair amount of support for assault mode monsters. besides, you have to remember that they are very new; however, I do agree with dinosaurs. I know it's not a type or an archetype, but I wish there was a lot more normal-support. they don't have effects, and they should be the monsters that rely on support the very most. in the old days, they had the highest ATK. but nowadays you can get plenty of monsters with the same ATK plus a powerful effect. I think it would have been an awesome idea to design synchro monsters to only be summoned by tuning with a normal monster. that would have brought back so many old normal cards of various stars, it would have given Konami the chance to unify synchros under their own support category (instead of relying on plant-support, psychic-support, etc. for tuning), and it would have given Konami the excuse to promote a whole new "archetype" of normal monsters. more money, new cards, old cards, everyone's happy.
~Specter (cow_pi) 20:20, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
imo
They should stop cranking out all the new half-baked archtypes and finish some of the old ones. They could use it. Just going back and helping Dino's, harpies, and the water type in general.
No Broken cards but some decient cards. This Is My Yubel 18:48, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
sucky archetypes
i would like a there be more support for monk,harpie,and B.E.S. cards they all like have like 4 monsters and 3 spell and trap cards some even less and there support useless and suck totally olny card that have ever totally doinated meta was dark,light,beast,monarchs,warior monsters never aqua type monsters or thunder type monsters.--Gyzarus 23:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
I personally would like to see them release monarch specific support cards as well as powerful support cards for blackwings, fiends, spellcasters, and psychics. Monarch1 00:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Blackwings? You have gotta be kidding me. Now with RGBT (common version of Honest) they are broken. --bewk3 00:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Psychics are getting decent amounts of Support in ancient prophecy with the new field card they get (Yes they get a field card :D!). Also I have already seen a way somebody can OTK somebody using all that psychic support, though it should only work if One for one is actually released, I dunno anybody who actually has it. Other than that monarch support cards would be interesting since monarchs are a deck type that is fairly hard to find since most people would rather use something else. More E Hero support would be nice as well.--Takuma. 01:10, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
TOONS
Nothing needs support like these things. NOTHING. Hell, just print some of the anime only stuff like Toon Kingdom. also, Synchros or xyzs. Say it with me TOON STARDUST DRAGON. or Number T39. Plenty of awesome stuff you can use.DreadKaiser (talk • contribs) 21:17, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
